CVE-2026-102699 (GCVE-0-2026-102699)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-13 15:45 – Updated: 2026-10-13 15:45
VLAI
Title
Arm: multiple issues with GNTTABOP_cache_flush
Summary
[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] 1) XSA-437 (CVE-2023-34321) addressed issues with overflows in calculations involved in guests flushing caches through GNTTABOP_cache_flush. Unfortunately the fix there introduced a calculation which may underflow, resulting in a loop which would - at least on 64-bit Arm - take excessively long, and which would likely eventually crash the hypervisor. This is CVE-2026-102699. 2) GNTTABOP_cache_flush may be issued on memory mapped from another domain using the grant table interface. However there was no restriction to disallow the use of invalidate-without-clean against read-only grant mappings, which may corrupt the granted memory. This is CVE-2026-102702.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
Assigner
XEN CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard D 56/100 over 46 records in the last 180 days details
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
Xen Xen Unknown: consult Xen advisory XSA-519
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-10-13 12:00
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "Xen",
          "vendor": "Xen",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unknown",
              "version": "consult Xen advisory XSA-519"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "configurations": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "All Xen versions from 4.5 onwards are vulnerable.  Xen versions 4.4 and\nearlier are not vulnerable.\n\nOnly Arm systems are vulnerable.  x86 systems are not vulnerable."
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "CVE-2026-102699 was discovered by Leonid Komarianskyi of EPAM.  It was\nlater independently reported by Ayan Kumar Halder of AMD.\n\nCVE-2026-102702 was found by the security team while looking at the\nsurrounding code."
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-10-13T12:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the\ntext explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.]\n\n1) XSA-437 (CVE-2023-34321) addressed issues with overflows in\n   calculations involved in guests flushing caches through\n   GNTTABOP_cache_flush.  Unfortunately the fix there introduced a\n   calculation which may underflow, resulting in a loop which would - at\n   least on 64-bit Arm - take excessively long, and which would likely\n   eventually crash the hypervisor.\n\n   This is CVE-2026-102699.\n\n2) GNTTABOP_cache_flush may be issued on memory mapped from another\n   domain using the grant table interface.  However there was no\n   restriction to disallow the use of invalidate-without-clean against\n   read-only grant mappings, which may corrupt the granted memory.\n\n   This is CVE-2026-102702."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "A malicious unprivileged guest may crash the hypervisor, causing a\nDenial of Service (DoS) affecting the entire host, or corrupt memory\nbelonging to another domain.  Privilege escalation and information leaks\ncannot be ruled out."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-10-13T15:45:13.073Z",
        "orgId": "23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f",
        "shortName": "XEN"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-519.html"
        }
      ],
      "title": "Arm: multiple issues with GNTTABOP_cache_flush",
      "workarounds": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "There is no known mitigation."
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f",
    "assignerShortName": "XEN",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-102699",
    "datePublished": "2026-10-13T15:45:13.073Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-29T16:11:40.973Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-10-13T15:45:13.073Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-102699",
      "date": "2026-10-14",
      "epss": "0.00146",
      "percentile": "0.0347"
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "affected": [
          {
            "affectedData": [
              {
                "defaultStatus": "unknown",
                "product": "Xen",
                "vendor": "Xen",
                "versions": [
                  {
                    "status": "unknown",
                    "version": "consult Xen advisory XSA-519"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ],
            "source": "security@xen.org"
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the\ntext explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.]\n\n1) XSA-437 (CVE-2023-34321) addressed issues with overflows in\n   calculations involved in guests flushing caches through\n   GNTTABOP_cache_flush.  Unfortunately the fix there introduced a\n   calculation which may underflow, resulting in a loop which would - at\n   least on 64-bit Arm - take excessively long, and which would likely\n   eventually crash the hypervisor.\n\n   This is CVE-2026-102699.\n\n2) GNTTABOP_cache_flush may be issued on memory mapped from another\n   domain using the grant table interface.  However there was no\n   restriction to disallow the use of invalidate-without-clean against\n   read-only grant mappings, which may corrupt the granted memory.\n\n   This is CVE-2026-102702."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2026-102699",
        "lastModified": "2026-10-13T16:17:09.510",
        "metrics": {},
        "published": "2026-10-13T16:17:09.510",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "security@xen.org",
            "url": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-519.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "security@xen.org",
        "vulnStatus": "Received"
      }
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.