CVE-2026-15920 (GCVE-0-2026-15920)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-04 15:48 – Updated: 2026-08-04 17:21
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Potential cross-site scripting via URLField values in the admin
Summary
An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.
`django.contrib.admin.utils.display_for_field()` renders `URLField` values as clickable links in the admin without validating the URL. A value stored with an unsafe scheme is displayed as a link on changelist and read-only admin pages, which allows cross-site scripting against staff users who click the link.
Exploitation requires the unsafe value to already be stored in the database. `URLField` validation through a `ModelForm` or the admin rejects unsafe schemes, so this affects applications that persist `URLField` data without running model validation, for example through direct queryset writes, deserialization, or bulk import of untrusted input.
Django would like to thank Egor Saltykov for reporting this issue.
Severity
6.1 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-83 - Improper Neutralization of Script in Attributes in a Web Page
Assigner
References
7 references
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| djangoproject | Django |
Affected:
6.0 , < 6.0.8
(python)
Unaffected: 6.0.8 (python) Affected: 5.2 , < 5.2.17 (python) Unaffected: 5.2.17 (python) |
Date Public
2026-08-04 10:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-15920",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-04T17:16:24.319084Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-04T17:21:13.428Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pypi.org/project/Django/",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "django",
"product": "Django",
"repo": "https://github.com/django/django/",
"vendor": "djangoproject",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.0.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.0",
"versionType": "python"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.0.8",
"versionType": "python"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.2.17",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.2",
"versionType": "python"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.2.17",
"versionType": "python"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Egor Saltykov"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Natalia Bidart"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "Natalia Bidart"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-08-04T10:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAn issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ccode\u003edjango.contrib.admin.utils.display_for_field()\u003c/code\u003e renders \u003ccode\u003eURLField\u003c/code\u003e values as clickable links in the admin without validating the URL. A value stored with an unsafe scheme is displayed as a link on changelist and read-only admin pages, which allows cross-site scripting against staff users who click the link.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eExploitation requires the unsafe value to already be stored in the database. \u003ccode\u003eURLField\u003c/code\u003e validation through a \u003ccode\u003eModelForm\u003c/code\u003e or the admin rejects unsafe schemes, so this affects applications that persist \u003ccode\u003eURLField\u003c/code\u003e data without running model validation, for example through direct queryset writes, deserialization, or bulk import of untrusted input.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDjango would like to thank Egor Saltykov for reporting this issue.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.\n`django.contrib.admin.utils.display_for_field()` renders `URLField` values as clickable links in the admin without validating the URL. A value stored with an unsafe scheme is displayed as a link on changelist and read-only admin pages, which allows cross-site scripting against staff users who click the link.\r\nExploitation requires the unsafe value to already be stored in the database. `URLField` validation through a `ModelForm` or the admin rejects unsafe schemes, so this affects applications that persist `URLField` data without running model validation, for example through direct queryset writes, deserialization, or bulk import of untrusted input.\nDjango would like to thank Egor Saltykov for reporting this issue."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-244",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-244: XSS Targeting URI Placeholders"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/internals/security/#security-issue-severity-levels",
"value": "moderate"
},
"type": "Django severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
"version": "4.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-83",
"description": "CWE-83: Improper Neutralization of Script in Attributes in a Web Page",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-04T15:48:40.537Z",
"orgId": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
"shortName": "DSF"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Django security archive",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/"
},
{
"name": "Django releases announcements",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/django-announce"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/django/django/commit/47511a21026cdd721d8fbf8571cc079bc38bb46d"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/django/django/commit/5a260d309a4c8010c2ebda24eb758a5d95e2508a"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/django/django/commit/13debb622a32720bda1bccda7622fd14fbf3931b"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/django/django/commit/b9adb81339cc418f8f56b1050cca6dfec3ab6349"
},
{
"name": "Django security releases issued: 6.0.8 and 5.2.17",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2026/aug/04/security-releases/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-07-13T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Initial report received."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Vulnerability confirmed."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-08-04T10:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Security release issued."
}
],
"title": "Potential cross-site scripting via URLField values in the admin",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
"assignerShortName": "DSF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-15920",
"datePublished": "2026-08-04T15:48:40.537Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-15T20:32:49.882Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-04T17:21:13.428Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-15920\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92\",\"published\":\"2026-08-04T17:16:46.733\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-08-04T18:16:45.087\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.\\n`django.contrib.admin.utils.display_for_field()` renders `URLField` values as clickable links in the admin without validating the URL. A value stored with an unsafe scheme is displayed as a link on changelist and read-only admin pages, which allows cross-site scripting against staff users who click the link.\\r\\nExploitation requires the unsafe value to already be stored in the database. `URLField` validation through a `ModelForm` or the admin rejects unsafe schemes, so this affects applications that persist `URLField` data without running model validation, for example through direct queryset writes, deserialization, or bulk import of untrusted input.\\nDjango would like to thank Egor Saltykov for reporting this issue.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"djangoproject\",\"product\":\"Django\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"collectionURL\":\"https://pypi.org/project/Django/\",\"packageName\":\"django\",\"repo\":\"https://github.com/django/django/\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"6.0\",\"lessThan\":\"6.0.8\",\"versionType\":\"python\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"6.0.8\",\"versionType\":\"python\",\"status\":\"unaffected\"},{\"version\":\"5.2\",\"lessThan\":\"5.2.17\",\"versionType\":\"python\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"5.2.17\",\"versionType\":\"python\",\"status\":\"unaffected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":5.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"ACTIVE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":6.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":2.7}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-08-04T17:16:24.319084Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-15920\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-83\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/\",\"source\":\"6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/django/django/commit/13debb622a32720bda1bccda7622fd14fbf3931b\",\"source\":\"6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/django/django/commit/47511a21026cdd721d8fbf8571cc079bc38bb46d\",\"source\":\"6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/django/django/commit/5a260d309a4c8010c2ebda24eb758a5d95e2508a\",\"source\":\"6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/django/django/commit/b9adb81339cc418f8f56b1050cca6dfec3ab6349\",\"source\":\"6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92\"},{\"url\":\"https://groups.google.com/g/django-announce\",\"source\":\"6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92\"},{\"url\":\"https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2026/aug/04/security-releases/\",\"source\":\"6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92\"}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-15920\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-08-04T17:16:24.319084Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-08-04T17:21:05.231Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Potential cross-site scripting via URLField values in the admin\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"EXTERNAL\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"reporter\", \"value\": \"Egor Saltykov\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation developer\", \"value\": \"Natalia Bidart\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"coordinator\", \"value\": \"Natalia Bidart\"}], \"impacts\": [{\"capecId\": \"CAPEC-244\", \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CAPEC-244: XSS Targeting URI Placeholders\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"Django severity rating\", \"content\": {\"value\": \"moderate\", \"namespace\": \"https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/internals/security/#security-issue-severity-levels\"}}}, {\"cvssV3_1\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 6.1, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N\"}}, {\"cvssV4_0\": {\"version\": \"4.0\", \"baseScore\": 5.1, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"repo\": \"https://github.com/django/django/\", \"vendor\": \"djangoproject\", \"product\": \"Django\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"6.0\", \"lessThan\": \"6.0.8\", \"versionType\": \"python\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"6.0.8\", \"versionType\": \"python\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"5.2\", \"lessThan\": \"5.2.17\", \"versionType\": \"python\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"5.2.17\", \"versionType\": \"python\"}], \"packageName\": \"django\", \"collectionURL\": \"https://pypi.org/project/Django/\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"timeline\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2026-07-13T00:00:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Initial report received.\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Vulnerability confirmed.\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2026-08-04T10:00:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Security release issued.\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2026-08-04T10:00:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/\", \"name\": \"Django security archive\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://groups.google.com/g/django-announce\", \"name\": \"Django releases announcements\", \"tags\": [\"mailing-list\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/django/django/commit/47511a21026cdd721d8fbf8571cc079bc38bb46d\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/django/django/commit/5a260d309a4c8010c2ebda24eb758a5d95e2508a\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/django/django/commit/13debb622a32720bda1bccda7622fd14fbf3931b\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/django/django/commit/b9adb81339cc418f8f56b1050cca6dfec3ab6349\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2026/aug/04/security-releases/\", \"name\": \"Django security releases issued: 6.0.8 and 5.2.17\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"cvelib 1.8.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.\\n`django.contrib.admin.utils.display_for_field()` renders `URLField` values as clickable links in the admin without validating the URL. A value stored with an unsafe scheme is displayed as a link on changelist and read-only admin pages, which allows cross-site scripting against staff users who click the link.\\r\\nExploitation requires the unsafe value to already be stored in the database. `URLField` validation through a `ModelForm` or the admin rejects unsafe schemes, so this affects applications that persist `URLField` data without running model validation, for example through direct queryset writes, deserialization, or bulk import of untrusted input.\\nDjango would like to thank Egor Saltykov for reporting this issue.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eAn issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ccode\u003edjango.contrib.admin.utils.display_for_field()\u003c/code\u003e renders \u003ccode\u003eURLField\u003c/code\u003e values as clickable links in the admin without validating the URL. A value stored with an unsafe scheme is displayed as a link on changelist and read-only admin pages, which allows cross-site scripting against staff users who click the link.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eExploitation requires the unsafe value to already be stored in the database. \u003ccode\u003eURLField\u003c/code\u003e validation through a \u003ccode\u003eModelForm\u003c/code\u003e or the admin rejects unsafe schemes, so this affects applications that persist \u003ccode\u003eURLField\u003c/code\u003e data without running model validation, for example through direct queryset writes, deserialization, or bulk import of untrusted input.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDjango would like to thank Egor Saltykov for reporting this issue.\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-83\", \"description\": \"CWE-83: Improper Neutralization of Script in Attributes in a Web Page\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92\", \"shortName\": \"DSF\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-08-04T15:48:40.537Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-15920\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-08-04T17:21:13.428Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-07-15T20:32:49.882Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-08-04T15:48:40.537Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"DSF\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
Loading…
Loading…