GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

CVE-2026-2391 (GCVE-0-2026-2391)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-12 04:39 – Updated: 2026-02-12 17:32
VLAI
Title
qs's arrayLimit bypass in comma parsing allows denial of service
Summary
### Summary The `arrayLimit` option in qs does not enforce limits for comma-separated values when `comma: true` is enabled, allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. This is a bypass of the array limit enforcement, similar to the bracket notation bypass addressed in GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p (CVE-2025-15284). ### Details When the `comma` option is set to `true` (not the default, but configurable in applications), qs allows parsing comma-separated strings as arrays (e.g., `?param=a,b,c` becomes `['a', 'b', 'c']`). However, the limit check for `arrayLimit` (default: 20) and the optional throwOnLimitExceeded occur after the comma-handling logic in `parseArrayValue`, enabling a bypass. This permits creation of arbitrarily large arrays from a single parameter, leading to excessive memory allocation. **Vulnerable code** (lib/parse.js: lines ~40-50): ```js if (val && typeof val === 'string' && options.comma && val.indexOf(',') > -1) {     return val.split(','); } if (options.throwOnLimitExceeded && currentArrayLength >= options.arrayLimit) {     throw new RangeError('Array limit exceeded. Only ' + options.arrayLimit + ' element' + (options.arrayLimit === 1 ? '' : 's') + ' allowed in an array.'); } return val; ``` The `split(',')` returns the array immediately, skipping the subsequent limit check. Downstream merging via `utils.combine` does not prevent allocation, even if it marks overflows for sparse arrays.This discrepancy allows attackers to send a single parameter with millions of commas (e.g., `?param=,,,,,,,,...`), allocating massive arrays in memory without triggering limits. It bypasses the intent of `arrayLimit`, which is enforced correctly for indexed (`a[0]=`) and bracket (`a[]=`) notations (the latter fixed in v6.14.1 per GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p). ### PoC **Test 1 - Basic bypass:** ``` npm install qs ``` ```js const qs = require('qs'); const payload = 'a=' + ','.repeat(25); // 26 elements after split (bypasses arrayLimit: 5) const options = { comma: true, arrayLimit: 5, throwOnLimitExceeded: true }; try {   const result = qs.parse(payload, options);   console.log(result.a.length); // Outputs: 26 (bypass successful) } catch (e) {   console.log('Limit enforced:', e.message); // Not thrown } ``` **Configuration:** - `comma: true` - `arrayLimit: 5` - `throwOnLimitExceeded: true` Expected: Throws "Array limit exceeded" error. Actual: Parses successfully, creating an array of length 26. ### Impact Denial of Service (DoS) via memory exhaustion.
SSVC
Exploitation: poc Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-02-12 15:00 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-20 - Improper Input Validation
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
Affected: 6.7.0 , ≤ 6.14.1 (semver)
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-2391",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-02-12T15:00:21.359233Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-02-12T15:00:40.388Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "exploit"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/ljharb/qs/security/advisories/GHSA-w7fw-mjwx-w883"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://npmjs.com/qs",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "qs",
          "repo": "https://github.com/ljharb/qs",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.14.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "6.7.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "### Summary\u003cbr\u003eThe `arrayLimit` option in qs does not enforce limits for comma-separated values when `comma: true` is enabled, allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. This is a bypass of the array limit enforcement, similar to the bracket notation bypass addressed in GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p (CVE-2025-15284).\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e### Details\u003cbr\u003eWhen the `comma` option is set to `true` (not the default, but configurable in applications), qs allows parsing comma-separated strings as arrays (e.g., `?param=a,b,c` becomes `[\u0027a\u0027, \u0027b\u0027, \u0027c\u0027]`). However, the limit check for `arrayLimit` (default: 20) and the optional throwOnLimitExceeded occur after the comma-handling logic in `parseArrayValue`, enabling a bypass. This permits creation of arbitrarily large arrays from a single parameter, leading to excessive memory allocation.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e**Vulnerable code** (lib/parse.js: lines ~40-50):\u003cbr\u003e```js\u003cbr\u003eif (val \u0026amp;\u0026amp; typeof val === \u0027string\u0027 \u0026amp;\u0026amp; options.comma \u0026amp;\u0026amp; val.indexOf(\u0027,\u0027) \u0026gt; -1) {\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; return val.split(\u0027,\u0027);\u003cbr\u003e}\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eif (options.throwOnLimitExceeded \u0026amp;\u0026amp; currentArrayLength \u0026gt;= options.arrayLimit) {\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; throw new RangeError(\u0027Array limit exceeded. Only \u0027 + options.arrayLimit + \u0027 element\u0027 + (options.arrayLimit === 1 ? \u0027\u0027 : \u0027s\u0027) + \u0027 allowed in an array.\u0027);\u003cbr\u003e}\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003ereturn val;\u003cbr\u003e```\u003cbr\u003eThe `split(\u0027,\u0027)` returns the array immediately, skipping the subsequent limit check. Downstream merging via `utils.combine` does not prevent allocation, even if it marks overflows for sparse arrays.This discrepancy allows attackers to send a single parameter with millions of commas (e.g., `?param=,,,,,,,,...`), allocating massive arrays in memory without triggering limits. It bypasses the intent of `arrayLimit`, which is enforced correctly for indexed (`a[0]=`) and bracket (`a[]=`) notations (the latter fixed in v6.14.1 per GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p).\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e### PoC\u003cbr\u003e**Test 1 - Basic bypass:**\u003cbr\u003e```\u003cbr\u003enpm install qs\u003cbr\u003e```\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e```js\u003cbr\u003econst qs = require(\u0027qs\u0027);\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003econst payload = \u0027a=\u0027 + \u0027,\u0027.repeat(25);  // 26 elements after split (bypasses arrayLimit: 5)\u003cbr\u003econst options = { comma: true, arrayLimit: 5, throwOnLimitExceeded: true };\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003etry {\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp; const result = qs.parse(payload, options);\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp; console.log(result.a.length);  // Outputs: 26 (bypass successful)\u003cbr\u003e} catch (e) {\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp; console.log(\u0027Limit enforced:\u0027, e.message);  // Not thrown\u003cbr\u003e}\u003cbr\u003e```\u003cbr\u003e**Configuration:**\u003cbr\u003e- `comma: true`\u003cbr\u003e- `arrayLimit: 5`\u003cbr\u003e- `throwOnLimitExceeded: true`\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eExpected: Throws \"Array limit exceeded\" error.\u003cbr\u003eActual: Parses successfully, creating an array of length 26.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e### Impact\u003cbr\u003eDenial of Service (DoS) via memory exhaustion.\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "### Summary\nThe `arrayLimit` option in qs does not enforce limits for comma-separated values when `comma: true` is enabled, allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. This is a bypass of the array limit enforcement, similar to the bracket notation bypass addressed in GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p (CVE-2025-15284).\n\n### Details\nWhen the `comma` option is set to `true` (not the default, but configurable in applications), qs allows parsing comma-separated strings as arrays (e.g., `?param=a,b,c` becomes `[\u0027a\u0027, \u0027b\u0027, \u0027c\u0027]`). However, the limit check for `arrayLimit` (default: 20) and the optional throwOnLimitExceeded occur after the comma-handling logic in `parseArrayValue`, enabling a bypass. This permits creation of arbitrarily large arrays from a single parameter, leading to excessive memory allocation.\n\n**Vulnerable code** (lib/parse.js: lines ~40-50):\n```js\nif (val \u0026\u0026 typeof val === \u0027string\u0027 \u0026\u0026 options.comma \u0026\u0026 val.indexOf(\u0027,\u0027) \u003e -1) {\n\u00a0 \u00a0 return val.split(\u0027,\u0027);\n}\n\nif (options.throwOnLimitExceeded \u0026\u0026 currentArrayLength \u003e= options.arrayLimit) {\n\u00a0 \u00a0 throw new RangeError(\u0027Array limit exceeded. Only \u0027 + options.arrayLimit + \u0027 element\u0027 + (options.arrayLimit === 1 ? \u0027\u0027 : \u0027s\u0027) + \u0027 allowed in an array.\u0027);\n}\n\nreturn val;\n```\nThe `split(\u0027,\u0027)` returns the array immediately, skipping the subsequent limit check. Downstream merging via `utils.combine` does not prevent allocation, even if it marks overflows for sparse arrays.This discrepancy allows attackers to send a single parameter with millions of commas (e.g., `?param=,,,,,,,,...`), allocating massive arrays in memory without triggering limits. It bypasses the intent of `arrayLimit`, which is enforced correctly for indexed (`a[0]=`) and bracket (`a[]=`) notations (the latter fixed in v6.14.1 per GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p).\n\n### PoC\n**Test 1 - Basic bypass:**\n```\nnpm install qs\n```\n\n```js\nconst qs = require(\u0027qs\u0027);\n\nconst payload = \u0027a=\u0027 + \u0027,\u0027.repeat(25);  // 26 elements after split (bypasses arrayLimit: 5)\nconst options = { comma: true, arrayLimit: 5, throwOnLimitExceeded: true };\n\ntry {\n\u00a0 const result = qs.parse(payload, options);\n\u00a0 console.log(result.a.length);  // Outputs: 26 (bypass successful)\n} catch (e) {\n\u00a0 console.log(\u0027Limit enforced:\u0027, e.message);  // Not thrown\n}\n```\n**Configuration:**\n- `comma: true`\n- `arrayLimit: 5`\n- `throwOnLimitExceeded: true`\n\nExpected: Throws \"Array limit exceeded\" error.\nActual: Parses successfully, creating an array of length 26.\n\n\n### Impact\nDenial of Service (DoS) via memory exhaustion."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-130",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-130 Excessive Allocation"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 6.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
            "baseScore": 3.7,
            "baseSeverity": "LOW",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-20",
              "description": "CWE-20 Improper Input Validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-02-12T17:32:05.953Z",
        "orgId": "7ffcee3d-2c14-4c3e-b844-86c6a321a158",
        "shortName": "harborist"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/ljharb/qs/security/advisories/GHSA-w7fw-mjwx-w883"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/ljharb/qs/commit/f6a7abff1f13d644db9b05fe4f2c98ada6bf8482"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "qs\u0027s arrayLimit bypass in comma parsing allows denial of service",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "7ffcee3d-2c14-4c3e-b844-86c6a321a158",
    "assignerShortName": "harborist",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-2391",
    "datePublished": "2026-02-12T04:39:42.914Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-02-12T03:52:09.332Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-02-12T17:32:05.953Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-2391",
      "date": "2026-09-16",
      "epss": "0.00496",
      "percentile": "0.41357"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-2391\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"7ffcee3d-2c14-4c3e-b844-86c6a321a158\",\"published\":\"2026-02-12T05:17:11.187\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-06-17T10:30:53.183\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"### Summary\\nThe `arrayLimit` option in qs does not enforce limits for comma-separated values when `comma: true` is enabled, allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. This is a bypass of the array limit enforcement, similar to the bracket notation bypass addressed in GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p (CVE-2025-15284).\\n\\n### Details\\nWhen the `comma` option is set to `true` (not the default, but configurable in applications), qs allows parsing comma-separated strings as arrays (e.g., `?param=a,b,c` becomes `[\u0027a\u0027, \u0027b\u0027, \u0027c\u0027]`). However, the limit check for `arrayLimit` (default: 20) and the optional throwOnLimitExceeded occur after the comma-handling logic in `parseArrayValue`, enabling a bypass. This permits creation of arbitrarily large arrays from a single parameter, leading to excessive memory allocation.\\n\\n**Vulnerable code** (lib/parse.js: lines ~40-50):\\n```js\\nif (val \u0026\u0026 typeof val === \u0027string\u0027 \u0026\u0026 options.comma \u0026\u0026 val.indexOf(\u0027,\u0027) \u003e -1) {\\n\u00a0 \u00a0 return val.split(\u0027,\u0027);\\n}\\n\\nif (options.throwOnLimitExceeded \u0026\u0026 currentArrayLength \u003e= options.arrayLimit) {\\n\u00a0 \u00a0 throw new RangeError(\u0027Array limit exceeded. Only \u0027 + options.arrayLimit + \u0027 element\u0027 + (options.arrayLimit === 1 ? \u0027\u0027 : \u0027s\u0027) + \u0027 allowed in an array.\u0027);\\n}\\n\\nreturn val;\\n```\\nThe `split(\u0027,\u0027)` returns the array immediately, skipping the subsequent limit check. Downstream merging via `utils.combine` does not prevent allocation, even if it marks overflows for sparse arrays.This discrepancy allows attackers to send a single parameter with millions of commas (e.g., `?param=,,,,,,,,...`), allocating massive arrays in memory without triggering limits. It bypasses the intent of `arrayLimit`, which is enforced correctly for indexed (`a[0]=`) and bracket (`a[]=`) notations (the latter fixed in v6.14.1 per GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p).\\n\\n### PoC\\n**Test 1 - Basic bypass:**\\n```\\nnpm install qs\\n```\\n\\n```js\\nconst qs = require(\u0027qs\u0027);\\n\\nconst payload = \u0027a=\u0027 + \u0027,\u0027.repeat(25);  // 26 elements after split (bypasses arrayLimit: 5)\\nconst options = { comma: true, arrayLimit: 5, throwOnLimitExceeded: true };\\n\\ntry {\\n\u00a0 const result = qs.parse(payload, options);\\n\u00a0 console.log(result.a.length);  // Outputs: 26 (bypass successful)\\n} catch (e) {\\n\u00a0 console.log(\u0027Limit enforced:\u0027, e.message);  // Not thrown\\n}\\n```\\n**Configuration:**\\n- `comma: true`\\n- `arrayLimit: 5`\\n- `throwOnLimitExceeded: true`\\n\\nExpected: Throws \\\"Array limit exceeded\\\" error.\\nActual: Parses successfully, creating an array of length 26.\\n\\n\\n### Impact\\nDenial of Service (DoS) via memory exhaustion.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"### Resumen\\nLa opci\u00f3n `arrayLimit` en qs no aplica l\u00edmites para valores separados por comas cuando `comma: true` est\u00e1 habilitado, permitiendo a los atacantes causar denegaci\u00f3n de servicio a trav\u00e9s del agotamiento de memoria. Esto es un bypass de la aplicaci\u00f3n del l\u00edmite de array, similar al bypass de notaci\u00f3n de corchetes abordado en GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p (CVE-2025-15284).\\n\\n### Detalles\\nCuando la opci\u00f3n `comma` se establece en `true` (no es el valor predeterminado, pero es configurable en las aplicaciones), qs permite analizar cadenas separadas por comas como arrays (por ejemplo, `?param=a,b,c` se convierte en `[\u0027a\u0027, \u0027b\u0027, \u0027c\u0027]`). Sin embargo, la verificaci\u00f3n de l\u00edmite para `arrayLimit` (predeterminado: 20) y la opci\u00f3n throwOnLimitExceeded ocurren despu\u00e9s de la l\u00f3gica de manejo de comas en `parseArrayValue`, lo que permite un bypass. Esto permite la creaci\u00f3n de arrays arbitrariamente grandes a partir de un solo par\u00e1metro, lo que lleva a una asignaci\u00f3n excesiva de memoria.\\n\\nC\u00f3digo vulnerable (lib/parse.js: l\u00edneas ~40-50):\\n```js\\nif (val \u0026amp;\u0026amp; typeof val === \u0027string\u0027 \u0026amp;\u0026amp; options.comma \u0026amp;\u0026amp; val.indexOf(\u0027,\u0027) \u0026gt; -1) {\\n    return val.split(\u0027,\u0027);\\n}\\n\\nif (options.throwOnLimitExceeded \u0026amp;\u0026amp; currentArrayLength \u0026gt;= options.arrayLimit) {\\n    throw new RangeError(\u0027Array limit exceeded. Only \u0027 + options.arrayLimit + \u0027 element\u0027 + (options.arrayLimit === 1 ? \u0027\u0027 : \u0027s\u0027) + \u0027 allowed in an array.\u0027);\\n}\\n\\nreturn val;\\n```\\nEl `split(\u0027,\u0027)` devuelve el array inmediatamente, omitiendo la verificaci\u00f3n de l\u00edmite subsiguiente. La fusi\u00f3n posterior a trav\u00e9s de `utils.combine` no evita la asignaci\u00f3n, incluso si marca desbordamientos para arrays dispersos. Esta discrepancia permite a los atacantes enviar un solo par\u00e1metro con millones de comas (por ejemplo, `?param=,,,,,,,,...`), asignando arrays masivos en memoria sin activar los l\u00edmites. Bypassea la intenci\u00f3n de `arrayLimit`, que se aplica correctamente para las notaciones indexadas (`a[0]=`) y de corchetes (`a[]=`) (esta \u00faltima corregida en v6.14.1 seg\u00fan GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p).\\n\\n### PoC\\nPrueba 1 - Bypass b\u00e1sico:\\n```\\nnpm install qs\\n```\\n\\n```js\\nconst qs = require(\u0027qs\u0027);\\n\\nconst payload = \u0027a=\u0027 + \u0027,\u0027.repeat(25);  // 26 elements after split (bypasses arrayLimit: 5)\\nconst options = { comma: true, arrayLimit: 5, throwOnLimitExceeded: true };\\n\\ntry {\\n  const result = qs.parse(payload, options);\\n  console.log(result.a.length);  // Outputs: 26 (bypass successful)\\n} catch (e) {\\n  console.log(\u0027Limit enforced:\u0027, e.message);  // Not thrown\\n}\\n```\\nConfiguraci\u00f3n:\\n- `comma: true`\\n- `arrayLimit: 5`\\n- `throwOnLimitExceeded: true`\\n\\nEsperado: Lanza el error \u0027Array limit exceeded\u0027.\\nReal: Analiza con \u00e9xito, creando un array de longitud 26.\\n\\n### Impacto\\nDenegaci\u00f3n de Servicio (DoS) a trav\u00e9s del agotamiento de memoria.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"7ffcee3d-2c14-4c3e-b844-86c6a321a158\",\"affectedData\":[{\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"collectionURL\":\"https://npmjs.com/qs\",\"packageName\":\"qs\",\"repo\":\"https://github.com/ljharb/qs\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"6.7.0\",\"lessThanOrEqual\":\"6.14.1\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"7ffcee3d-2c14-4c3e-b844-86c6a321a158\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":6.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"PRESENT\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"7ffcee3d-2c14-4c3e-b844-86c6a321a158\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L\",\"baseScore\":3.7,\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"LOW\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":1.4},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-02-12T15:00:21.359233Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-2391\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"poc\"},{\"automatable\":\"yes\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"7ffcee3d-2c14-4c3e-b844-86c6a321a158\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-20\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-noinfo\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:qs_project:qs:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"6.7.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"6.14.2\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"94E3C0EE-F451-4D63-8670-0E428FED05AD\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/ljharb/qs/commit/f6a7abff1f13d644db9b05fe4f2c98ada6bf8482\",\"source\":\"7ffcee3d-2c14-4c3e-b844-86c6a321a158\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/ljharb/qs/security/advisories/GHSA-w7fw-mjwx-w883\",\"source\":\"7ffcee3d-2c14-4c3e-b844-86c6a321a158\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/ljharb/qs/security/advisories/GHSA-w7fw-mjwx-w883\",\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
      "current_release_date": "2026-07-02T21:42:14+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-2391",
      "id": "CVE-2026-2391",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-02-12T04:39:42.914000+00:00",
      "product_status:known_affected": "134",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "qs: qs\u0027s arrayLimit bypass in comma parsing allows denial of service",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-2391.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "suse_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "important",
      "current_release_date": "2026-09-03T16:31:57Z",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-2391",
      "id": "CVE-2026-2391",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-09-03T16:31:57Z",
      "source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
      "status": "interim",
      "title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2026-2391",
      "url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2026-2391.json",
      "version": "2"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-2391\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-02-12T15:00:21.359233Z\"}}}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/ljharb/qs/security/advisories/GHSA-w7fw-mjwx-w883\", \"tags\": [\"exploit\"]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-02-12T15:00:12.364Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"qs\u0027s arrayLimit bypass in comma parsing allows denial of service\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"impacts\": [{\"capecId\": \"CAPEC-130\", \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CAPEC-130 Excessive Allocation\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV4_0\": {\"Safety\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"version\": \"4.0\", \"Recovery\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"baseScore\": 6.3, \"Automatable\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"valueDensity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N\", \"exploitMaturity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"providerUrgency\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"PRESENT\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\": \"NOT_DEFINED\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}, {\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 3.7, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"LOW\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"repo\": \"https://github.com/ljharb/qs\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"6.7.0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"6.14.1\"}], \"packageName\": \"qs\", \"collectionURL\": \"https://npmjs.com/qs\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/ljharb/qs/security/advisories/GHSA-w7fw-mjwx-w883\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/ljharb/qs/commit/f6a7abff1f13d644db9b05fe4f2c98ada6bf8482\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.5.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"### Summary\\nThe `arrayLimit` option in qs does not enforce limits for comma-separated values when `comma: true` is enabled, allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. This is a bypass of the array limit enforcement, similar to the bracket notation bypass addressed in GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p (CVE-2025-15284).\\n\\n### Details\\nWhen the `comma` option is set to `true` (not the default, but configurable in applications), qs allows parsing comma-separated strings as arrays (e.g., `?param=a,b,c` becomes `[\u0027a\u0027, \u0027b\u0027, \u0027c\u0027]`). However, the limit check for `arrayLimit` (default: 20) and the optional throwOnLimitExceeded occur after the comma-handling logic in `parseArrayValue`, enabling a bypass. This permits creation of arbitrarily large arrays from a single parameter, leading to excessive memory allocation.\\n\\n**Vulnerable code** (lib/parse.js: lines ~40-50):\\n```js\\nif (val \u0026\u0026 typeof val === \u0027string\u0027 \u0026\u0026 options.comma \u0026\u0026 val.indexOf(\u0027,\u0027) \u003e -1) {\\n\\u00a0 \\u00a0 return val.split(\u0027,\u0027);\\n}\\n\\nif (options.throwOnLimitExceeded \u0026\u0026 currentArrayLength \u003e= options.arrayLimit) {\\n\\u00a0 \\u00a0 throw new RangeError(\u0027Array limit exceeded. Only \u0027 + options.arrayLimit + \u0027 element\u0027 + (options.arrayLimit === 1 ? \u0027\u0027 : \u0027s\u0027) + \u0027 allowed in an array.\u0027);\\n}\\n\\nreturn val;\\n```\\nThe `split(\u0027,\u0027)` returns the array immediately, skipping the subsequent limit check. Downstream merging via `utils.combine` does not prevent allocation, even if it marks overflows for sparse arrays.This discrepancy allows attackers to send a single parameter with millions of commas (e.g., `?param=,,,,,,,,...`), allocating massive arrays in memory without triggering limits. It bypasses the intent of `arrayLimit`, which is enforced correctly for indexed (`a[0]=`) and bracket (`a[]=`) notations (the latter fixed in v6.14.1 per GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p).\\n\\n### PoC\\n**Test 1 - Basic bypass:**\\n```\\nnpm install qs\\n```\\n\\n```js\\nconst qs = require(\u0027qs\u0027);\\n\\nconst payload = \u0027a=\u0027 + \u0027,\u0027.repeat(25);  // 26 elements after split (bypasses arrayLimit: 5)\\nconst options = { comma: true, arrayLimit: 5, throwOnLimitExceeded: true };\\n\\ntry {\\n\\u00a0 const result = qs.parse(payload, options);\\n\\u00a0 console.log(result.a.length);  // Outputs: 26 (bypass successful)\\n} catch (e) {\\n\\u00a0 console.log(\u0027Limit enforced:\u0027, e.message);  // Not thrown\\n}\\n```\\n**Configuration:**\\n- `comma: true`\\n- `arrayLimit: 5`\\n- `throwOnLimitExceeded: true`\\n\\nExpected: Throws \\\"Array limit exceeded\\\" error.\\nActual: Parses successfully, creating an array of length 26.\\n\\n\\n### Impact\\nDenial of Service (DoS) via memory exhaustion.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"### Summary\u003cbr\u003eThe `arrayLimit` option in qs does not enforce limits for comma-separated values when `comma: true` is enabled, allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. This is a bypass of the array limit enforcement, similar to the bracket notation bypass addressed in GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p (CVE-2025-15284).\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e### Details\u003cbr\u003eWhen the `comma` option is set to `true` (not the default, but configurable in applications), qs allows parsing comma-separated strings as arrays (e.g., `?param=a,b,c` becomes `[\u0027a\u0027, \u0027b\u0027, \u0027c\u0027]`). However, the limit check for `arrayLimit` (default: 20) and the optional throwOnLimitExceeded occur after the comma-handling logic in `parseArrayValue`, enabling a bypass. This permits creation of arbitrarily large arrays from a single parameter, leading to excessive memory allocation.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e**Vulnerable code** (lib/parse.js: lines ~40-50):\u003cbr\u003e```js\u003cbr\u003eif (val \u0026amp;\u0026amp; typeof val === \u0027string\u0027 \u0026amp;\u0026amp; options.comma \u0026amp;\u0026amp; val.indexOf(\u0027,\u0027) \u0026gt; -1) {\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; return val.split(\u0027,\u0027);\u003cbr\u003e}\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eif (options.throwOnLimitExceeded \u0026amp;\u0026amp; currentArrayLength \u0026gt;= options.arrayLimit) {\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; throw new RangeError(\u0027Array limit exceeded. Only \u0027 + options.arrayLimit + \u0027 element\u0027 + (options.arrayLimit === 1 ? \u0027\u0027 : \u0027s\u0027) + \u0027 allowed in an array.\u0027);\u003cbr\u003e}\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003ereturn val;\u003cbr\u003e```\u003cbr\u003eThe `split(\u0027,\u0027)` returns the array immediately, skipping the subsequent limit check. Downstream merging via `utils.combine` does not prevent allocation, even if it marks overflows for sparse arrays.This discrepancy allows attackers to send a single parameter with millions of commas (e.g., `?param=,,,,,,,,...`), allocating massive arrays in memory without triggering limits. It bypasses the intent of `arrayLimit`, which is enforced correctly for indexed (`a[0]=`) and bracket (`a[]=`) notations (the latter fixed in v6.14.1 per GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p).\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e### PoC\u003cbr\u003e**Test 1 - Basic bypass:**\u003cbr\u003e```\u003cbr\u003enpm install qs\u003cbr\u003e```\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e```js\u003cbr\u003econst qs = require(\u0027qs\u0027);\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003econst payload = \u0027a=\u0027 + \u0027,\u0027.repeat(25);  // 26 elements after split (bypasses arrayLimit: 5)\u003cbr\u003econst options = { comma: true, arrayLimit: 5, throwOnLimitExceeded: true };\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003etry {\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp; const result = qs.parse(payload, options);\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp; console.log(result.a.length);  // Outputs: 26 (bypass successful)\u003cbr\u003e} catch (e) {\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp; console.log(\u0027Limit enforced:\u0027, e.message);  // Not thrown\u003cbr\u003e}\u003cbr\u003e```\u003cbr\u003e**Configuration:**\u003cbr\u003e- `comma: true`\u003cbr\u003e- `arrayLimit: 5`\u003cbr\u003e- `throwOnLimitExceeded: true`\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eExpected: Throws \\\"Array limit exceeded\\\" error.\u003cbr\u003eActual: Parses successfully, creating an array of length 26.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e### Impact\u003cbr\u003eDenial of Service (DoS) via memory exhaustion.\u003cbr\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-20\", \"description\": \"CWE-20 Improper Input Validation\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"7ffcee3d-2c14-4c3e-b844-86c6a321a158\", \"shortName\": \"harborist\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-02-12T17:32:05.953Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-2391\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-02-12T17:32:05.953Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-02-12T03:52:09.332Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"7ffcee3d-2c14-4c3e-b844-86c6a321a158\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-02-12T04:39:42.914Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"harborist\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…