CVE-2026-32148 (GCVE-0-2026-32148)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-30 18:17 – Updated: 2026-05-01 04:33
VLAI?
Title
Lockfile checksums not verified in Hex allows dependency integrity bypass
Summary
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in hexpm hex (Hex.RemoteConverger module) allows dependency integrity bypass via unverified lockfile checksums.
Hex stores checksums for dependencies in the mix.lock file to ensure reproducible and integrity-checked builds. However, Hex.RemoteConverger.verify_resolved/2 never executes checksum verification because the lock data returned by Hex.Utils.lock/1 uses string-based dependency names, while the verification logic compares against atom-based names. This type mismatch causes the verification code path to be silently skipped. Checksums are still validated when packages are initially downloaded from the registry, but mismatches between the lockfile and resolved dependencies are not detected.
An attacker who can influence cached packages (e.g., via local cache poisoning or a compromised registry) can provide modified dependency contents that will be accepted without detection. The mix.lock file is silently rewritten with the checksum values from the registry, erasing evidence of tampering.
This issue affects hex: from 0.16.0 before 2.4.2.
Severity ?
CWE
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | |
|---|---|---|
Impacted products
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-32148",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-30T19:03:06.385106Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-30T19:03:24.858Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/hexpm/hex/security/advisories/GHSA-hmv9-4mfr-m92v"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:hexpm:hex:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.Hex.RemoteConverger\u0027"
],
"packageName": "hex",
"packageURL": "pkg:otp/hex?repository_url=https:%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fhexpm%2Fhex\u0026vcs_url=git%20https:%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fhexpm%2Fhex.git",
"product": "hex",
"programFiles": [
"lib/hex/remote_converger.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.Hex.RemoteConverger\u0027:verify_resolved/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/hexpm/hex",
"vendor": "hexpm",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.4.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.16.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:hexpm:hex:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.Hex.RemoteConverger\u0027"
],
"packageName": "hexpm/hex",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/hexpm/hex",
"product": "hex",
"programFiles": [
"lib/hex/remote_converger.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.Hex.RemoteConverger\u0027:verify_resolved/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/hexpm/hex.git",
"vendor": "hexpm",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "d7528c8199a1144511508bf3a6460026a5a14c8e",
"status": "affected",
"version": "e01576f28c64af9fae6eb17e2dad30f6efcb303c",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:hexpm:hex:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.4.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "0.16.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Paul Fleischer"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Jonatan M\u00e4nnchen / EEF"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation reviewer",
"value": "Eric Meadows-J\u00f6nsson / Hex.pm"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in hexpm hex (\u003ctt\u003eHex.RemoteConverger\u003c/tt\u003e module) allows dependency integrity bypass via unverified lockfile checksums.\u003cp\u003eHex stores checksums for dependencies in the \u003ctt\u003emix.lock\u003c/tt\u003e file to ensure reproducible and integrity-checked builds. However, \u003ctt\u003eHex.RemoteConverger.verify_resolved/2\u003c/tt\u003e never executes checksum verification because the lock data returned by \u003ctt\u003eHex.Utils.lock/1\u003c/tt\u003e uses string-based dependency names, while the verification logic compares against atom-based names. This type mismatch causes the verification code path to be silently skipped. Checksums are still validated when packages are initially downloaded from the registry, but mismatches between the lockfile and resolved dependencies are not detected.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAn attacker who can influence cached packages (e.g., via local cache poisoning or a compromised registry) can provide modified dependency contents that will be accepted without detection. The \u003ctt\u003emix.lock\u003c/tt\u003e file is silently rewritten with the checksum values from the registry, erasing evidence of tampering.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects hex: from 0.16.0 before 2.4.2.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in hexpm hex (Hex.RemoteConverger module) allows dependency integrity bypass via unverified lockfile checksums.\n\nHex stores checksums for dependencies in the mix.lock file to ensure reproducible and integrity-checked builds. However, Hex.RemoteConverger.verify_resolved/2 never executes checksum verification because the lock data returned by Hex.Utils.lock/1 uses string-based dependency names, while the verification logic compares against atom-based names. This type mismatch causes the verification code path to be silently skipped. Checksums are still validated when packages are initially downloaded from the registry, but mismatches between the lockfile and resolved dependencies are not detected.\n\nAn attacker who can influence cached packages (e.g., via local cache poisoning or a compromised registry) can provide modified dependency contents that will be accepted without detection. The mix.lock file is silently rewritten with the checksum values from the registry, erasing evidence of tampering.\n\nThis issue affects hex: from 0.16.0 before 2.4.2."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.9,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-494",
"description": "CWE-494 Download of Code Without Integrity Check",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-01T04:33:38.198Z",
"orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"shortName": "EEF"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/hexpm/hex/security/advisories/GHSA-hmv9-4mfr-m92v"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-32148.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-32148"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/hexpm/hex/commit/d7528c8199a1144511508bf3a6460026a5a14c8e"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Lockfile checksums not verified in Hex allows dependency integrity bypass",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"assignerShortName": "EEF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-32148",
"datePublished": "2026-04-30T18:17:03.783Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-10T22:37:29.213Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-01T04:33:38.198Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-32148",
"date": "2026-05-04",
"epss": "0.00019",
"percentile": "0.05209"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-32148\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\",\"published\":\"2026-04-30T19:16:09.000\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-05-01T15:26:51.053\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in hexpm hex (Hex.RemoteConverger module) allows dependency integrity bypass via unverified lockfile checksums.\\n\\nHex stores checksums for dependencies in the mix.lock file to ensure reproducible and integrity-checked builds. However, Hex.RemoteConverger.verify_resolved/2 never executes checksum verification because the lock data returned by Hex.Utils.lock/1 uses string-based dependency names, while the verification logic compares against atom-based names. This type mismatch causes the verification code path to be silently skipped. Checksums are still validated when packages are initially downloaded from the registry, but mismatches between the lockfile and resolved dependencies are not detected.\\n\\nAn attacker who can influence cached packages (e.g., via local cache poisoning or a compromised registry) can provide modified dependency contents that will be accepted without detection. The mix.lock file is silently rewritten with the checksum values from the registry, erasing evidence of tampering.\\n\\nThis issue affects hex: from 0.16.0 before 2.4.2.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":8.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"PRESENT\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"ACTIVE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-354\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-494\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-32148.html\",\"source\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/hexpm/hex/commit/d7528c8199a1144511508bf3a6460026a5a14c8e\",\"source\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/hexpm/hex/security/advisories/GHSA-hmv9-4mfr-m92v\",\"source\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\"},{\"url\":\"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-32148\",\"source\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/hexpm/hex/security/advisories/GHSA-hmv9-4mfr-m92v\",\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\"}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-32148\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-04-30T19:03:06.385106Z\"}}}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/hexpm/hex/security/advisories/GHSA-hmv9-4mfr-m92v\", \"tags\": [\"exploit\"]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-30T19:03:21.319Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Lockfile checksums not verified in Hex allows dependency integrity bypass\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"EXTERNAL\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Paul Fleischer\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation developer\", \"value\": \"Jonatan M\\u00e4nnchen / EEF\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation reviewer\", \"value\": \"Eric Meadows-J\\u00f6nsson / Hex.pm\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV4_0\": {\"Safety\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"version\": \"4.0\", \"Recovery\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"baseScore\": 8.9, \"Automatable\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"valueDensity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H\", \"exploitMaturity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"providerUrgency\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"userInteraction\": \"ACTIVE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"PRESENT\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\": \"NOT_DEFINED\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"cpes\": [\"cpe:2.3:a:hexpm:hex:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\"], \"repo\": \"https://github.com/hexpm/hex\", \"vendor\": \"hexpm\", \"modules\": [\"\u0027Elixir.Hex.RemoteConverger\u0027\"], \"product\": \"hex\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0.16.0\", \"lessThan\": \"2.4.2\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}], \"packageURL\": \"pkg:otp/hex?repository_url=https:%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fhexpm%2Fhex\u0026vcs_url=git%20https:%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fhexpm%2Fhex.git\", \"packageName\": \"hex\", \"programFiles\": [\"lib/hex/remote_converger.ex\"], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\", \"programRoutines\": [{\"name\": \"\u0027Elixir.Hex.RemoteConverger\u0027:verify_resolved/2\"}]}, {\"cpes\": [\"cpe:2.3:a:hexpm:hex:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\"], \"repo\": \"https://github.com/hexpm/hex.git\", \"vendor\": \"hexpm\", \"modules\": [\"\u0027Elixir.Hex.RemoteConverger\u0027\"], \"product\": \"hex\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"e01576f28c64af9fae6eb17e2dad30f6efcb303c\", \"lessThan\": \"d7528c8199a1144511508bf3a6460026a5a14c8e\", \"versionType\": \"git\"}], \"packageURL\": \"pkg:github/hexpm/hex\", \"packageName\": \"hexpm/hex\", \"programFiles\": [\"lib/hex/remote_converger.ex\"], \"collectionURL\": \"https://github.com\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\", \"programRoutines\": [{\"name\": \"\u0027Elixir.Hex.RemoteConverger\u0027:verify_resolved/2\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/hexpm/hex/security/advisories/GHSA-hmv9-4mfr-m92v\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\", \"related\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-32148.html\", \"tags\": [\"related\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-32148\", \"tags\": [\"related\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/hexpm/hex/commit/d7528c8199a1144511508bf3a6460026a5a14c8e\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"cvelib 1.8.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in hexpm hex (Hex.RemoteConverger module) allows dependency integrity bypass via unverified lockfile checksums.\\n\\nHex stores checksums for dependencies in the mix.lock file to ensure reproducible and integrity-checked builds. However, Hex.RemoteConverger.verify_resolved/2 never executes checksum verification because the lock data returned by Hex.Utils.lock/1 uses string-based dependency names, while the verification logic compares against atom-based names. This type mismatch causes the verification code path to be silently skipped. Checksums are still validated when packages are initially downloaded from the registry, but mismatches between the lockfile and resolved dependencies are not detected.\\n\\nAn attacker who can influence cached packages (e.g., via local cache poisoning or a compromised registry) can provide modified dependency contents that will be accepted without detection. The mix.lock file is silently rewritten with the checksum values from the registry, erasing evidence of tampering.\\n\\nThis issue affects hex: from 0.16.0 before 2.4.2.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in hexpm hex (\u003ctt\u003eHex.RemoteConverger\u003c/tt\u003e module) allows dependency integrity bypass via unverified lockfile checksums.\u003cp\u003eHex stores checksums for dependencies in the \u003ctt\u003emix.lock\u003c/tt\u003e file to ensure reproducible and integrity-checked builds. However, \u003ctt\u003eHex.RemoteConverger.verify_resolved/2\u003c/tt\u003e never executes checksum verification because the lock data returned by \u003ctt\u003eHex.Utils.lock/1\u003c/tt\u003e uses string-based dependency names, while the verification logic compares against atom-based names. This type mismatch causes the verification code path to be silently skipped. Checksums are still validated when packages are initially downloaded from the registry, but mismatches between the lockfile and resolved dependencies are not detected.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAn attacker who can influence cached packages (e.g., via local cache poisoning or a compromised registry) can provide modified dependency contents that will be accepted without detection. The \u003ctt\u003emix.lock\u003c/tt\u003e file is silently rewritten with the checksum values from the registry, erasing evidence of tampering.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects hex: from 0.16.0 before 2.4.2.\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-354\", \"description\": \"CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value\"}]}, {\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-494\", \"description\": \"CWE-494 Download of Code Without Integrity Check\"}]}], \"cpeApplicability\": [{\"nodes\": [{\"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:hexpm:hex:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true, \"versionEndExcluding\": \"2.4.2\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"0.16.0\"}], \"operator\": \"OR\"}], \"operator\": \"AND\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\", \"shortName\": \"EEF\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-01T04:33:38.198Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-32148\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-01T04:33:38.198Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-03-10T22:37:29.213Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-04-30T18:17:03.783Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"EEF\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…