CVE-2026-4133 (GCVE-0-2026-4133)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-22 07:45 – Updated: 2026-04-23 13:43
VLAI
Title
TextP2P Texting Widget <= 1.7 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update
Summary
The TextP2P Texting Widget plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 1.7. This is due to missing nonce validation in the imTextP2POptionPage() function which processes settings updates. The form at line 314 does not include a wp_nonce_field(), and the POST handler at line 7 does not call check_admin_referer() or wp_verify_nonce() before processing settings changes. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update all plugin settings including chat widget titles, messages, API credentials, colors, and reCAPTCHA configuration via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-352 - Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Assigner
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
textp2p TextP2P Texting Widget Affected: 0 , ≤ 1.7 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Credits
Muhammad Afnaan
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-4133",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-04-23T13:43:18.985707Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-04-23T13:43:28.246Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "TextP2P Texting Widget",
          "vendor": "textp2p",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "1.7",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Muhammad Afnaan"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The TextP2P Texting Widget plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 1.7. This is due to missing nonce validation in the imTextP2POptionPage() function which processes settings updates. The form at line 314 does not include a wp_nonce_field(), and the POST handler at line 7 does not call check_admin_referer() or wp_verify_nonce() before processing settings changes. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update all plugin settings including chat widget titles, messages, API credentials, colors, and reCAPTCHA configuration via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 4.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-352",
              "description": "CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-04-22T07:45:33.274Z",
        "orgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
        "shortName": "Wordfence"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/2d36fa25-108b-462b-b84e-2e77943b1871?source=cve"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/textp2p-texting-widget/trunk/inc/admin/im-textp2p-options.php#L299"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/textp2p-texting-widget/tags/1.7/inc/admin/im-textp2p-options.php#L299"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/textp2p-texting-widget/trunk/inc/admin/im-textp2p-options.php#L7"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/textp2p-texting-widget/tags/1.7/inc/admin/im-textp2p-options.php#L7"
        }
      ],
      "timeline": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2026-04-21T19:07:48.000Z",
          "value": "Disclosed"
        }
      ],
      "title": "TextP2P Texting Widget \u003c= 1.7 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
    "assignerShortName": "Wordfence",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-4133",
    "datePublished": "2026-04-22T07:45:33.274Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-03-13T14:22:05.633Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-04-23T13:43:28.246Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-4133",
      "date": "2026-06-25",
      "epss": "0.00156",
      "percentile": "0.05149"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-4133\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@wordfence.com\",\"published\":\"2026-04-22T09:16:24.400\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-04-22T20:22:50.570\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The TextP2P Texting Widget plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 1.7. This is due to missing nonce validation in the imTextP2POptionPage() function which processes settings updates. The form at line 314 does not include a wp_nonce_field(), and the POST handler at line 7 does not call check_admin_referer() or wp_verify_nonce() before processing settings changes. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update all plugin settings including chat widget titles, messages, API credentials, colors, and reCAPTCHA configuration via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security@wordfence.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":1.4}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security@wordfence.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-352\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/textp2p-texting-widget/tags/1.7/inc/admin/im-textp2p-options.php#L299\",\"source\":\"security@wordfence.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/textp2p-texting-widget/tags/1.7/inc/admin/im-textp2p-options.php#L7\",\"source\":\"security@wordfence.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/textp2p-texting-widget/trunk/inc/admin/im-textp2p-options.php#L299\",\"source\":\"security@wordfence.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/textp2p-texting-widget/trunk/inc/admin/im-textp2p-options.php#L7\",\"source\":\"security@wordfence.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/2d36fa25-108b-462b-b84e-2e77943b1871?source=cve\",\"source\":\"security@wordfence.com\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"cna\": {\"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599\", \"shortName\": \"Wordfence\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-22T07:45:33.274Z\"}, \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"textp2p\", \"product\": \"TextP2P Texting Widget\", \"versions\": [{\"version\": \"0\", \"status\": \"affected\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"1.7\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The TextP2P Texting Widget plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 1.7. This is due to missing nonce validation in the imTextP2POptionPage() function which processes settings updates. The form at line 314 does not include a wp_nonce_field(), and the POST handler at line 7 does not call check_admin_referer() or wp_verify_nonce() before processing settings changes. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update all plugin settings including chat widget titles, messages, API credentials, colors, and reCAPTCHA configuration via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link.\"}], \"title\": \"TextP2P Texting Widget \u003c= 1.7 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/2d36fa25-108b-462b-b84e-2e77943b1871?source=cve\"}, {\"url\": \"https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/textp2p-texting-widget/trunk/inc/admin/im-textp2p-options.php#L299\"}, {\"url\": \"https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/textp2p-texting-widget/tags/1.7/inc/admin/im-textp2p-options.php#L299\"}, {\"url\": \"https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/textp2p-texting-widget/trunk/inc/admin/im-textp2p-options.php#L7\"}, {\"url\": \"https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/textp2p-texting-widget/tags/1.7/inc/admin/im-textp2p-options.php#L7\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"description\": \"CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-352\", \"type\": \"CWE\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 4.3, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\"}}], \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Muhammad Afnaan\"}], \"timeline\": [{\"time\": \"2026-04-21T19:07:48.000Z\", \"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Disclosed\"}]}, \"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-4133\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-04-23T13:43:18.985707Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-23T13:43:24.509Z\"}}]}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-4133\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"assignerShortName\": \"Wordfence\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-03-13T14:22:05.633Z\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-04-22T07:45:33.274Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-23T13:43:28.246Z\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…