CVE-2026-43947 (GCVE-0-2026-43947)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-21 21:33 – Updated: 2026-07-23 13:57
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
FUXA Vulnerable to Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Script Test Mode Authorization Bypass
Summary
FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. Version 1.3.0 has an unauthenticated Remote Code Execution vulnerability when `secureEnabled` is set to `true`. The `POST /api/runscript` endpoint checks authorization against the stored script's permission by ID, but when `test: true` is set in the request, it compiles and executes attacker-supplied code instead of the stored script's code. An unauthenticated attacker who knows a valid script ID and name may execute arbitrary code via test mode if at least one server-side script exists and is accessible without restrictive permissions. Script IDs and names can be obtained through the unauthenticated information disclosure in `GET /api/project` (reported separately). The only prerequisite is that at least one server-side script exists in the project. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-07-23 13:57 UTC
CWE
- CWE-863 - Incorrect Authorization
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/security/advis… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/pull/2260 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/commit/78534da… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/releases/tag/v1.3.1 | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| frangoteam | FUXA |
Affected:
= 1.3.0
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-43947",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-23T13:57:00.510556Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-23T13:57:18.426Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/security/advisories/GHSA-rg3m-cfq7-g6h6"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "FUXA",
"vendor": "frangoteam",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "= 1.3.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. Version 1.3.0 has an unauthenticated Remote Code Execution vulnerability when `secureEnabled` is set to `true`. The `POST /api/runscript` endpoint checks authorization against the stored script\u0027s permission by ID, but when `test: true` is set in the request, it compiles and executes attacker-supplied code instead of the stored script\u0027s code. An unauthenticated attacker who knows a valid script ID and name may execute arbitrary code via test mode if at least one server-side script exists and is accessible without restrictive permissions. Script IDs and names can be obtained through the unauthenticated information disclosure in `GET /api/project` (reported separately). The only prerequisite is that at least one server-side script exists in the project. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.9,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-21T21:33:09.631Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/security/advisories/GHSA-rg3m-cfq7-g6h6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/security/advisories/GHSA-rg3m-cfq7-g6h6"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/pull/2260",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/pull/2260"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/commit/78534da61a91613712b44bb63c8d7da8c5df5ca4",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/commit/78534da61a91613712b44bb63c8d7da8c5df5ca4"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/releases/tag/v1.3.1",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/releases/tag/v1.3.1"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-rg3m-cfq7-g6h6",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "FUXA Vulnerable to Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Script Test Mode Authorization Bypass"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-43947",
"datePublished": "2026-07-21T21:33:09.631Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-04T16:59:09.090Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-23T13:57:18.426Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-43947",
"date": "2026-10-27",
"epss": "0.00911",
"percentile": "0.5981"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "FUXA",
"vendor": "frangoteam",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "= 1.3.0"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. Version 1.3.0 has an unauthenticated Remote Code Execution vulnerability when `secureEnabled` is set to `true`. The `POST /api/runscript` endpoint checks authorization against the stored script\u0027s permission by ID, but when `test: true` is set in the request, it compiles and executes attacker-supplied code instead of the stored script\u0027s code. An unauthenticated attacker who knows a valid script ID and name may execute arbitrary code via test mode if at least one server-side script exists and is accessible without restrictive permissions. Script IDs and names can be obtained through the unauthenticated information disclosure in `GET /api/project` (reported separately). The only prerequisite is that at least one server-side script exists in the project. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "FUXA es un software de Visualizaci\u00f3n de Procesos (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) basado en web. La versi\u00f3n 1.3.0 tiene una vulnerabilidad de ejecuci\u00f3n remota de c\u00f3digo no autenticada cuando \u2019secureEnabled\u2019 est\u00e1 configurado como \u2019true\u2019. El endpoint \u2019POST /api/runscript\u2019 comprueba la autorizaci\u00f3n contra el permiso del script almacenado por ID, pero cuando \u2019test: true\u2019 est\u00e1 configurado en la solicitud, compila y ejecuta c\u00f3digo proporcionado por el atacante en lugar del c\u00f3digo del script almacenado. Un atacante no autenticado que conoce un ID y nombre de script v\u00e1lidos puede ejecutar c\u00f3digo arbitrario a trav\u00e9s del modo de prueba si existe al menos un script del lado del servidor y es accesible sin permisos restrictivos. Los ID y nombres de los scripts se pueden obtener a trav\u00e9s de la revelaci\u00f3n de informaci\u00f3n no autenticada en \u2019GET /api/project\u2019 (reportado por separado). El \u00fanico requisito previo es que exista al menos un script del lado del servidor en el proyecto. La versi\u00f3n 1.3.1 corrige el problema."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-43947",
"lastModified": "2026-10-24T19:10:00.127",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 8.9,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "PROOF_OF_CONCEPT",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-43947",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-23T13:57:00.510556Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-07-21T22:17:01.560",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/commit/78534da61a91613712b44bb63c8d7da8c5df5ca4"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/pull/2260"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/releases/tag/v1.3.1"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/security/advisories/GHSA-rg3m-cfq7-g6h6"
},
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/security/advisories/GHSA-rg3m-cfq7-g6h6"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-863"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-43947",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-23T13:57:00.510556Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-23T13:57:13.712Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/security/advisories/GHSA-rg3m-cfq7-g6h6"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "FUXA",
"vendor": "frangoteam",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "= 1.3.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. Version 1.3.0 has an unauthenticated Remote Code Execution vulnerability when `secureEnabled` is set to `true`. The `POST /api/runscript` endpoint checks authorization against the stored script\u0027s permission by ID, but when `test: true` is set in the request, it compiles and executes attacker-supplied code instead of the stored script\u0027s code. An unauthenticated attacker who knows a valid script ID and name may execute arbitrary code via test mode if at least one server-side script exists and is accessible without restrictive permissions. Script IDs and names can be obtained through the unauthenticated information disclosure in `GET /api/project` (reported separately). The only prerequisite is that at least one server-side script exists in the project. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.9,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-21T21:33:09.631Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/security/advisories/GHSA-rg3m-cfq7-g6h6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/security/advisories/GHSA-rg3m-cfq7-g6h6"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/pull/2260",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/pull/2260"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/commit/78534da61a91613712b44bb63c8d7da8c5df5ca4",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/commit/78534da61a91613712b44bb63c8d7da8c5df5ca4"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/releases/tag/v1.3.1",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/releases/tag/v1.3.1"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-rg3m-cfq7-g6h6",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "FUXA Vulnerable to Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Script Test Mode Authorization Bypass"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-43947",
"datePublished": "2026-07-21T21:33:09.631Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-04T16:59:09.090Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-23T13:57:18.426Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.