CVE-2026-44057 (GCVE-0-2026-44057)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-21 08:14 – Updated: 2026-05-21 08:23
VLAI?
Title
Dead bounds check in Spotlight RPC unmarshaller
Summary
A dead bounds check in the Spotlight RPC unmarshaller in Netatalk 3.0.0 through 4.4.2 results in an unreachable code path that provides no effective bounds protection, which may allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain limited information via crafted Spotlight RPC requests.
Severity ?
CWE
- CWE-561 - Dead Code
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://netatalk.io/security/CVE-2026-44057 | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
Date Public ?
2026-05-13 00:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Netatalk",
"vendor": "Netatalk",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.4.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.4.3",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Arjun Basnet from Securin"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A dead bounds check in the Spotlight RPC unmarshaller in Netatalk 3.0.0 through 4.4.2 results in an unreachable code path that provides no effective bounds protection, which may allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain limited information via crafted Spotlight RPC requests."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 3.1,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-561",
"description": "Dead Code",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-21T08:23:38.881Z",
"orgId": "33c584b5-0579-4c06-b2a0-8d8329fcab9c",
"shortName": "securin"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Netatalk Security Advisory CVE-2026-44057",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://netatalk.io/security/CVE-2026-44057"
}
],
"title": "Dead bounds check in Spotlight RPC unmarshaller"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "33c584b5-0579-4c06-b2a0-8d8329fcab9c",
"assignerShortName": "securin",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-44057",
"datePublished": "2026-05-21T08:14:31.770Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-05T07:25:12.312Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-21T08:23:38.881Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-44057\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"33c584b5-0579-4c06-b2a0-8d8329fcab9c\",\"published\":\"2026-05-21T09:16:27.930\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-05-21T09:16:27.930\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A dead bounds check in the Spotlight RPC unmarshaller in Netatalk 3.0.0 through 4.4.2 results in an unreachable code path that provides no effective bounds protection, which may allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain limited information via crafted Spotlight RPC requests.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"33c584b5-0579-4c06-b2a0-8d8329fcab9c\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":3.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.6,\"impactScore\":1.4}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"33c584b5-0579-4c06-b2a0-8d8329fcab9c\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-561\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://netatalk.io/security/CVE-2026-44057\",\"source\":\"33c584b5-0579-4c06-b2a0-8d8329fcab9c\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…