CVE-2026-45575 (GCVE-0-2026-45575)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-26 21:01 – Updated: 2026-05-28 14:11
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
epa4all-client: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Summary
epa4all-client is the Java Client for epa4all / ePA 3.0 in the Telematik Infrastruktur. Prior to 1.2.2, an attacker who can MITM the TLS connection between the client and the IDP (within the TI network) can substitute a forged discovery document. The forged document redirects uri_puk_idp_enc and uri_puk_idp_sig to attacker-controlled URLs. The client then encrypts the SMC-B-signed challenge response to the attacker's encryption key and POSTs it to the attacker's auth endpoint. This captures the signed authentication material. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.2.2.
Severity
7.4 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-05-28 14:11 UTC
CWE
- CWE-347 - Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/securi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/pull/36 | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| oviva-ag | epa4all-client |
Affected:
< 1.2.2
|
|
| com.oviva.telematik | epa4all-client |
Affected:
< 1.2.2
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-45575",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-28T14:11:18.105155Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-28T14:11:30.565Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "epa4all-client",
"vendor": "oviva-ag",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.2.2"
}
]
},
{
"product": "epa4all-client",
"vendor": "com.oviva.telematik",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.2.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "epa4all-client is the Java Client for epa4all / ePA 3.0 in the Telematik Infrastruktur. Prior to 1.2.2, an attacker who can MITM the TLS connection between the client and the IDP (within the TI network) can substitute a forged discovery document. The forged document redirects uri_puk_idp_enc and uri_puk_idp_sig to attacker-controlled URLs. The client then encrypts the SMC-B-signed challenge response to the attacker\u0027s encryption key and POSTs it to the attacker\u0027s auth endpoint. This captures the signed authentication material. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.2.2."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-347",
"description": "CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-26T21:01:51.745Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/security/advisories/GHSA-gqx7-6552-67hf",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/security/advisories/GHSA-gqx7-6552-67hf"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/pull/36",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/pull/36"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-gqx7-6552-67hf",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "epa4all-client: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-45575",
"datePublished": "2026-05-26T21:01:51.745Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-12T19:00:14.600Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-28T14:11:30.565Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-45575",
"date": "2026-08-14",
"epss": "0.00118",
"percentile": "0.01996"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-45575\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-05-26T21:16:40.373\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-07-24T11:10:00.170\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"epa4all-client is the Java Client for epa4all / ePA 3.0 in the Telematik Infrastruktur. Prior to 1.2.2, an attacker who can MITM the TLS connection between the client and the IDP (within the TI network) can substitute a forged discovery document. The forged document redirects uri_puk_idp_enc and uri_puk_idp_sig to attacker-controlled URLs. The client then encrypts the SMC-B-signed challenge response to the attacker\u0027s encryption key and POSTs it to the attacker\u0027s auth endpoint. This captures the signed authentication material. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.2.2.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"epa4all-client es el Cliente Java para epa4all / ePA 3.0 en la Telematik Infrastruktur. Anterior a la 1.2.2, un atacante que puede realizar un MitM a la conexi\u00f3n TLS entre el cliente y el IDP (dentro de la red TI) puede sustituir un documento de descubrimiento falsificado. El documento falsificado redirige uri_puk_idp_enc y uri_puk_idp_sig a URLs controladas por el atacante. El cliente entonces cifra la respuesta al desaf\u00edo firmada con SMC-B con la clave de cifrado del atacante y la env\u00eda mediante POST al endpoint de autenticaci\u00f3n del atacante. Esto captura el material de autenticaci\u00f3n firmado. Esta vulnerabilidad est\u00e1 corregida en la versi\u00f3n 1.2.2.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"oviva-ag\",\"product\":\"epa4all-client\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003c 1.2.2\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]},{\"vendor\":\"com.oviva.telematik\",\"product\":\"epa4all-client\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003c 1.2.2\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.4,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":5.2}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-05-28T14:11:18.105155Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-45575\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"total\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-347\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/pull/36\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/security/advisories/GHSA-gqx7-6552-67hf\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}",
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-05-28T20:12:51+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2026-45575",
"id": "CVE-2026-45575",
"initial_release_date": "2026-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "epa4all-client: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-45575.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-45575\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-05-28T14:11:18.105155Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-28T14:11:26.946Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"epa4all-client: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-gqx7-6552-67hf\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.4, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"oviva-ag\", \"product\": \"epa4all-client\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 1.2.2\"}]}, {\"vendor\": \"com.oviva.telematik\", \"product\": \"epa4all-client\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 1.2.2\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/security/advisories/GHSA-gqx7-6552-67hf\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/security/advisories/GHSA-gqx7-6552-67hf\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/pull/36\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/pull/36\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"epa4all-client is the Java Client for epa4all / ePA 3.0 in the Telematik Infrastruktur. Prior to 1.2.2, an attacker who can MITM the TLS connection between the client and the IDP (within the TI network) can substitute a forged discovery document. The forged document redirects uri_puk_idp_enc and uri_puk_idp_sig to attacker-controlled URLs. The client then encrypts the SMC-B-signed challenge response to the attacker\u0027s encryption key and POSTs it to the attacker\u0027s auth endpoint. This captures the signed authentication material. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.2.2.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-347\", \"description\": \"CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-26T21:01:51.745Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-45575\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-28T14:11:30.565Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-05-12T19:00:14.600Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-05-26T21:01:51.745Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…