CVE-2026-58089 (GCVE-0-2026-58089)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-26 04:30 – Updated: 2026-08-26 15:24
VLAI
Title
hwpmc fails to detach PMCs during exec credential transitions
Summary
When a process calls execve(2) to execute a setuid or setgid image, hwpmc(4) is supposed to detach PMCs owned by unprivileged processes. An inverted check meant that this scenario was not handled properly. An unprivileged local user who has attached PMCs to a process can continue monitoring it after the process executes a setuid or setgid binary, contrary to the intended policy.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-26 15:23 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-273 - Improper Check for Dropped Privileges
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
FreeBSD FreeBSD Affected: 15.1-RELEASE , < p3 (release)
Affected: 15.0-RELEASE , < p13 (release)
Affected: 14.4-RELEASE , < p9 (release)
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-08-25 19:45
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "LOCAL",
              "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
              "baseScore": 7.8,
              "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
              "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
              "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
              "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-58089",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-08-26T15:23:48.918745Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-08-26T15:24:26.038Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "modules": [
            "hwpmc"
          ],
          "product": "FreeBSD",
          "vendor": "FreeBSD",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "p3",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "15.1-RELEASE",
              "versionType": "release"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "p13",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "15.0-RELEASE",
              "versionType": "release"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "p9",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "14.4-RELEASE",
              "versionType": "release"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Alexander Leidinger"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-08-25T19:45:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "When a process calls execve(2) to execute a setuid or setgid image, hwpmc(4) is supposed to detach PMCs owned by unprivileged processes.  An inverted check meant that this scenario was not handled properly.\n\nAn unprivileged local user who has attached PMCs to a process can continue monitoring it after the process executes a setuid or setgid binary, contrary to the intended policy."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-273",
              "description": "CWE-273: Improper Check for Dropped Privileges",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-08-26T04:30:06.543Z",
        "orgId": "63664ac6-956c-4cba-a5d0-f46076e16109",
        "shortName": "freebsd"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:56.hwpmc.asc"
        }
      ],
      "title": "hwpmc fails to detach PMCs during exec credential transitions",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "63664ac6-956c-4cba-a5d0-f46076e16109",
    "assignerShortName": "freebsd",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-58089",
    "datePublished": "2026-08-26T04:30:06.543Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-06-29T01:40:17.498Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-08-26T15:24:26.038Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-58089",
      "date": "2026-08-29",
      "epss": "0.00119",
      "percentile": "0.01977"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-58089\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secteam@freebsd.org\",\"published\":\"2026-08-26T05:18:12.080\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-08-26T16:54:50.030\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Undergoing Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"When a process calls execve(2) to execute a setuid or setgid image, hwpmc(4) is supposed to detach PMCs owned by unprivileged processes.  An inverted check meant that this scenario was not handled properly.\\n\\nAn unprivileged local user who has attached PMCs to a process can continue monitoring it after the process executes a setuid or setgid binary, contrary to the intended policy.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"secteam@freebsd.org\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"FreeBSD\",\"product\":\"FreeBSD\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unknown\",\"modules\":[\"hwpmc\"],\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"15.1-RELEASE\",\"lessThan\":\"p3\",\"versionType\":\"release\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"15.0-RELEASE\",\"lessThan\":\"p13\",\"versionType\":\"release\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"14.4-RELEASE\",\"lessThan\":\"p9\",\"versionType\":\"release\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":7.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.8,\"impactScore\":5.9}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-08-26T15:23:48.918745Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-58089\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"total\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"secteam@freebsd.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-273\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:56.hwpmc.asc\",\"source\":\"secteam@freebsd.org\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.8, \"attackVector\": \"LOCAL\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-58089\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-08-26T15:23:48.918745Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-08-26T15:24:22.691Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"hwpmc fails to detach PMCs during exec credential transitions\", \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Alexander Leidinger\"}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"FreeBSD\", \"modules\": [\"hwpmc\"], \"product\": \"FreeBSD\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"15.1-RELEASE\", \"lessThan\": \"p3\", \"versionType\": \"release\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"15.0-RELEASE\", \"lessThan\": \"p13\", \"versionType\": \"release\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"14.4-RELEASE\", \"lessThan\": \"p9\", \"versionType\": \"release\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unknown\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2026-08-25T19:45:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:56.hwpmc.asc\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"cvelib 1.8.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"When a process calls execve(2) to execute a setuid or setgid image, hwpmc(4) is supposed to detach PMCs owned by unprivileged processes.  An inverted check meant that this scenario was not handled properly.\\n\\nAn unprivileged local user who has attached PMCs to a process can continue monitoring it after the process executes a setuid or setgid binary, contrary to the intended policy.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-273\", \"description\": \"CWE-273: Improper Check for Dropped Privileges\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"63664ac6-956c-4cba-a5d0-f46076e16109\", \"shortName\": \"freebsd\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-08-26T04:30:06.543Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-58089\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-08-26T15:24:26.038Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-06-29T01:40:17.498Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"63664ac6-956c-4cba-a5d0-f46076e16109\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-08-26T04:30:06.543Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"freebsd\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…