CVE-2026-72746 (GCVE-0-2026-72746)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-11 12:17 – Updated: 2026-08-12 16:58
VLAI

This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority as it's a duplicate of CVE-2026-73241.

Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-08-12T16:58:13.054Z",
        "orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
        "shortName": "VulnCheck"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority as it\u0027s a duplicate of CVE-2026-73241.\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority as it\u0027s a duplicate of CVE-2026-73241."
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
    "assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-72746",
    "datePublished": "2026-08-11T12:17:00.687Z",
    "dateRejected": "2026-08-12T16:58:13.054Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-08-10T13:53:42.482Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-08-12T16:58:13.054Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-72746",
      "date": "2026-08-12",
      "epss": "0.00435",
      "percentile": "0.3597"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-72746\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"disclosure@vulncheck.com\",\"published\":\"2026-08-11T13:19:05.520\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-08-12T17:17:31.793\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Rejected\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority as it\u0027s a duplicate of CVE-2026-73241.\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "Important",
      "current_release_date": "2026-08-11T15:07:53+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-72746",
      "id": "CVE-2026-72746",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-08-11T12:17:00.687000+00:00",
      "product_status:known_affected": "7",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "24",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "FreeRDP: FreeRDP: Authentication bypass in RDSTLS handshake via PDU-type confusion",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-72746.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"cna\": {\"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10\", \"shortName\": \"VulnCheck\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-08-12T16:58:13.054Z\"}, \"rejectedReasons\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority as it\u0027s a duplicate of CVE-2026-73241.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"base64\": false, \"value\": \"This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority as it\u0027s a duplicate of CVE-2026-73241.\u003cbr\u003e\"}]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"vulncheck-endgame\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-72746\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10\", \"state\": \"REJECTED\", \"assignerShortName\": \"VulnCheck\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-08-10T13:53:42.482Z\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-08-11T12:17:00.687Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-08-12T16:58:13.054Z\", \"dateRejected\": \"2026-08-12T16:58:13.054Z\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.