FKIE_CVE-2003-0264

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2003-05-27 04:00 - Updated: 2025-04-03 01:03

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:seattle_lab_software:slmail:5.1.0.4420:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "3BA79655-45C9-4E98-A30C-026B5A51295C",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Multiple buffer overflows in SLMail 5.1.0.4420 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a long EHLO argument to slmail.exe, (2) a long XTRN argument to slmail.exe, (3) a long string to POPPASSWD, or (4) a long password to the POP3 server."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "M\u00faltiples desbordamientos de b\u00fafer en SLMail 5.1.0.4420  permite que atacantes remotos ejecuten c\u00f3digo arbitrario mediante (1) un argumento EHLO largo a slmail.exe, (2) un argumento XTRN largo a slmail.exe, (3) una cadena larga para POPPASSWD, o (4) un password largo para el servidor POP3."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2003-0264",
  "lastModified": "2025-04-03T01:03:51.193",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "LOW",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
        "impactScore": 6.4,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": true,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2003-05-27T04:00:00.000",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=105232506011335\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=ntbugtraq\u0026m=105233360321895\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/161526/SLMail-5.1.0.4420-Remote-Code-Execution.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Patch",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.nextgenss.com/advisories/slmail-vulns.txt"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=105232506011335\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=ntbugtraq\u0026m=105233360321895\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/161526/SLMail-5.1.0.4420-Remote-Code-Execution.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Patch",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.nextgenss.com/advisories/slmail-vulns.txt"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "NVD-CWE-Other"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…