FKIE_CVE-2004-2770

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2011-09-25 10:55 - Updated: 2023-11-07 01:57
Severity ?
Summary
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-3389. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-3389. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-3389 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-3389.  Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-3389.  Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-3389 instead of this candidate.  All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage"
    }
  ],
  "evaluatorComment": "Per http://ekoparty.org/2011/juliano-rizzo.php, \u0027Our exploit abuses a vulnerability present in the SSL/TLS implementation of major Web browsers at the time of writing.\u0027\r\n\r\nThe current configuration includes released versions of major browsers. List \r\nsubject to change based on additional information as it becomes available.\r\n",
  "id": "CVE-2004-2770",
  "lastModified": "2023-11-07T01:57:07.220",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2011-09-25T10:55:04.737",
  "references": [],
  "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Rejected"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.