FKIE_CVE-2005-2387

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2005-07-27 04:00 - Updated: 2025-04-03 01:03
Severity ?
Summary
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in GoodTech SMTP server 5.16 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a RCPT TO command with a long DNS name, or (2) a large number of RCPT TO commands with a long e-mail name arugment in the last command.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://seclists.org/lists/bugtraq/2005/Jul/0402.htmlExploit, Vendor Advisory
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14357
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://seclists.org/lists/bugtraq/2005/Jul/0402.htmlExploit, Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14357
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
goodtech_systems goodtech_smtp_server 5.16
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:goodtech_systems:goodtech_smtp_server:5.16:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "C185F1E2-0FAF-4169-B8FE-DB4A3F86A80E",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in GoodTech SMTP server 5.16 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a RCPT TO command with a long DNS name, or (2) a large number of RCPT TO commands with a long e-mail name arugment in the last command."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "M\u00faltiples desbordamientos de b\u00fafer en GoodTech SMTP server 5.16 permite que atacantes remotos ejecuten c\u00f3digo arbitrario mediante 1) un comando RCPT TO con un nombre DNS largo, o 2) un n\u00famero grande de comandos RCPT TO  con un nombre largo de e-mail en el \u00faltimo comando."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2005-2387",
  "lastModified": "2025-04-03T01:03:51.193",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "LOW",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
        "impactScore": 6.4,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": true,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2005-07-27T04:00:00.000",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://seclists.org/lists/bugtraq/2005/Jul/0402.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14357"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://seclists.org/lists/bugtraq/2005/Jul/0402.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14357"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "NVD-CWE-Other"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.