FKIE_CVE-2006-1236
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2006-03-15 00:02 - Updated: 2026-06-16 22:22
Severity
Summary
Buffer overflow in the SetUp function in socket/request.c in CrossFire 1.9.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long setup sound command, a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-1010.
References
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"source": "cve@mitre.org"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:crossfire:crossfire:1.9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C32B2D9E-86D3-4F4F-9C68-C7E5780F1C2B",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Buffer overflow in the SetUp function in socket/request.c in CrossFire 1.9.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long setup sound command, a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-1010."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2006-1236",
"lastModified": "2026-06-16T22:22:16.543",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 6.4,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": true,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
]
},
"published": "2006-03-15T00:02:00.000",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/crossfire/crossfire/socket/request.c?rev=1.86\u0026view=log"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/163873/Crossfire-Server-1.0-Buffer-Overflow.html"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/19237"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/19276"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1009"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/23904"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17093"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0951"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/25252"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/1582"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/crossfire/crossfire/socket/request.c?rev=1.86\u0026view=log"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/163873/Crossfire-Server-1.0-Buffer-Overflow.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/19237"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/19276"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1009"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/23904"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17093"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0951"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/25252"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/1582"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NVD-CWE-Other"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…