fkie_cve-2007-1267
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2007-03-06 20:19
Modified
2025-04-09 00:30
Severity ?
Summary
Sylpheed 2.2.7 and earlier does not properly use the --status-fd argument when invoking GnuPG, which prevents Sylpheed from visually distinguishing between signed and unsigned portions of OpenPGP messages with multiple components, which allows remote attackers to forge the contents of a message without detection.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
sylpheed sylpheed *



{
   configurations: [
      {
         nodes: [
            {
               cpeMatch: [
                  {
                     criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:sylpheed:sylpheed:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                     matchCriteriaId: "BE098EB5-A7CC-4F64-A4B5-892A7027DCD5",
                     versionEndIncluding: "2.2.7",
                     vulnerable: true,
                  },
               ],
               negate: false,
               operator: "OR",
            },
         ],
      },
   ],
   cveTags: [],
   descriptions: [
      {
         lang: "en",
         value: "Sylpheed 2.2.7 and earlier does not properly use the --status-fd argument when invoking GnuPG, which prevents Sylpheed from visually distinguishing between signed and unsigned portions of OpenPGP messages with multiple components, which allows remote attackers to forge the contents of a message without detection.",
      },
      {
         lang: "es",
         value: "Sylpheed 2.2.7 y anteriores no utilizan adecuadamente el argumento --status-fd al invocar a GnuPG, lo cual provoca que Sylpheed no distinga visualmente entre trozos firmados y no firmados de mensajes OpenPGP con múltiples componentes, lo cual permite a atacantes remotos falsificar el contenido de un mensaje si ser detectado.",
      },
   ],
   id: "CVE-2007-1267",
   lastModified: "2025-04-09T00:30:58.490",
   metrics: {
      cvssMetricV2: [
         {
            acInsufInfo: false,
            baseSeverity: "MEDIUM",
            cvssData: {
               accessComplexity: "LOW",
               accessVector: "NETWORK",
               authentication: "NONE",
               availabilityImpact: "NONE",
               baseScore: 5,
               confidentialityImpact: "NONE",
               integrityImpact: "PARTIAL",
               vectorString: "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
               version: "2.0",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 10,
            impactScore: 2.9,
            obtainAllPrivilege: false,
            obtainOtherPrivilege: false,
            obtainUserPrivilege: false,
            source: "nvd@nist.gov",
            type: "Primary",
            userInteractionRequired: false,
         },
      ],
   },
   published: "2007-03-06T20:19:00.000",
   references: [
      {
         source: "cve@mitre.org",
         url: "http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2007-March/030514.html",
      },
      {
         source: "cve@mitre.org",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/24414",
      },
      {
         source: "cve@mitre.org",
         url: "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/2353",
      },
      {
         source: "cve@mitre.org",
         tags: [
            "Exploit",
            "Vendor Advisory",
         ],
         url: "http://www.coresecurity.com/?action=item&id=1687",
      },
      {
         source: "cve@mitre.org",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/461958/100/0/threaded",
      },
      {
         source: "cve@mitre.org",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/461958/30/7710/threaded",
      },
      {
         source: "cve@mitre.org",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22777",
      },
      {
         source: "cve@mitre.org",
         url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017727",
      },
      {
         source: "cve@mitre.org",
         url: "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/0835",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         url: "http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2007-March/030514.html",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/24414",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         url: "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/2353",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         tags: [
            "Exploit",
            "Vendor Advisory",
         ],
         url: "http://www.coresecurity.com/?action=item&id=1687",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/461958/100/0/threaded",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/461958/30/7710/threaded",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22777",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017727",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         url: "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/0835",
      },
   ],
   sourceIdentifier: "cve@mitre.org",
   vulnStatus: "Deferred",
   weaknesses: [
      {
         description: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "NVD-CWE-Other",
            },
         ],
         source: "nvd@nist.gov",
         type: "Primary",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.