FKIE_CVE-2008-7182
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2009-09-08 10:30 - Updated: 2025-04-09 00:30
Severity ?
Summary
Buffer overflow in the IMAP service in NetWin Surgemail 3.9e, and possibly other versions before 3.9g2, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long first argument to the APPEND command, a different vector than CVE-2008-1497 and CVE-2008-1498. NOTE: due to lack of details, it is not certain whether this is the same issue as CVE-2008-2859.
References
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:netwin:surgemail:3.9e:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "3B7F09A9-9719-47C2-8021-853F699A7553",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Buffer overflow in the IMAP service in NetWin Surgemail 3.9e, and possibly other versions before 3.9g2, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long first argument to the APPEND command, a different vector than CVE-2008-1497 and CVE-2008-1498. NOTE: due to lack of details, it is not certain whether this is the same issue as CVE-2008-2859."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Desbordamiento de b\u00fafer en el servicio IMAP en NetWin Surgemail v3.9e, y probablemente otras versiones anteriores a v3.9g2, permite a usuarios autenticados remotamente provocar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (parada) y probablemente ejecutar c\u00f3digo de su elecci\u00f3n mediante un primer argumento largo en el comando APPEN, siendo un vector diferente que CVE-2008-1497 y CVE-2008-1498. NOTA: ante la falta de detalles, no est\u00e1 confirmado que sea la misma vulnerabilidad que CVE-2008-2859."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2008-7182",
"lastModified": "2025-04-09T00:30:58.490",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "SINGLE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 4.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
]
},
"published": "2009-09-08T10:30:01.733",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.netwinsite.com/surgemail/help/updates.htm"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/496482"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30000"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/5968"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.netwinsite.com/surgemail/help/updates.htm"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/496482"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30000"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/5968"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-119"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…