FKIE_CVE-2010-1687
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2010-05-04 16:00 - Updated: 2025-04-11 00:51
Severity ?
Summary
Stack-based buffer overflow in lpd.exe in Mocha W32 LPD 1.9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted "recieve jobs" request. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| mochasoft | mocha_w32_lpd | 1.9 |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:mochasoft:mocha_w32_lpd:1.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "81DDFFE7-7C87-4F0F-85B9-B92A123F1B03",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Stack-based buffer overflow in lpd.exe in Mocha W32 LPD 1.9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted \"recieve jobs\" request. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Desbordamiento de b\u00faffer basado en pila en lpd.exe en Mocha W32 LPD v1.9 permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (ca\u00edda) y posiblemente ejecutar c\u00f3digo de su elecci\u00f3n a trav\u00e9s de una petici\u00f3n manipulada de \"recieve jobs\". NOTA: algunos de estos detalles se han obtenido de informaci\u00f3n de terceros."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2010-1687",
"lastModified": "2025-04-11T00:51:21.963",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
]
},
"published": "2010-05-04T16:00:35.590",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/39394"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://www.corelan.be:8800/index.php/forum/security-advisories/corelan-10-023-mocha-lpd-remote-buffer-overflow/"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://www.corelan.be:8800/wp-content/forum-file-uploads/mr_me/mochalpd.py_.txt"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/63902"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/39394"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.corelan.be:8800/index.php/forum/security-advisories/corelan-10-023-mocha-lpd-remote-buffer-overflow/"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.corelan.be:8800/wp-content/forum-file-uploads/mr_me/mochalpd.py_.txt"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/63902"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-119"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…