FKIE_CVE-2012-4072

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2013-09-20 16:55 - Updated: 2025-04-11 00:51
Severity ?
Summary
The KVM subsystem in Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) relies on a hardcoded X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers, and read keyboard and mouse events, by leveraging knowledge of this certificate's private key, aka Bug ID CSCte90327.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
cisco unified_computing_system -

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:cisco:unified_computing_system:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "301FBC67-7946-479D-ACC5-D54CBD698291",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The KVM subsystem in Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) relies on a hardcoded X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers, and read keyboard and mouse events, by leveraging knowledge of this certificate\u0027s private key, aka Bug ID CSCte90327."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El subsistema KVM en Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) depende de un certificado X.509 embebido (hardcoded), lo cual permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle falsificar servidores SSL, y leer eventos del teclado y del rat\u00f3n, aprovechando el conocimiento de la clave privada de ese certifcado, tambi\u00e9n conocido como Bug ID CSCte90327."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2012-4072",
  "lastModified": "2025-04-11T00:51:21.963",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 4.3,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
        "impactScore": 2.9,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2013-09-20T16:55:03.427",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "psirt@cisco.com",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityNotice/CVE-2012-4072"
    },
    {
      "source": "psirt@cisco.com",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory",
        "VDB Entry"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1029067"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityNotice/CVE-2012-4072"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory",
        "VDB Entry"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1029067"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "psirt@cisco.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-20"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…