FKIE_CVE-2012-4875
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2012-09-06 21:55 - Updated: 2025-04-11 00:51
Severity ?
Summary
Heap-based buffer overflow in gdevwpr2.c in Ghostscript 9.04, when processing the OutputFile device parameter, allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long file name in a PostScript document. NOTE: as of 20120314, the developer was not able to reproduce the issue and disputed it
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| artifex | gpl_ghostscript | 9.04 |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:artifex:gpl_ghostscript:9.04:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "37D4D9B3-8829-4494-B2E2-8CBB1E592F34",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [
{
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"disputed"
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Heap-based buffer overflow in gdevwpr2.c in Ghostscript 9.04, when processing the OutputFile device parameter, allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long file name in a PostScript document. NOTE: as of 20120314, the developer was not able to reproduce the issue and disputed it"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "** EN DISPUTA ** Un desbordamiento de b\u00fafer basado en memoria din\u00e1mica (heap) en gdevwpr2.c en Ghostscript v9.04, al procesar el par\u00e1metro de dispositivo \u0027OutputFile\u0027, permite ejecutar c\u00f3digo de su elecci\u00f3n a atacantes remotos con cierta ayuda de un usuario local a trav\u00e9s de un nombre de archivo largo en un documento PostScript. NOTA: a partir de 14/03/2012, el desarrollador no ha podido reproducir el problema y por tanto lo pone en duda.\r\n"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2012-4875",
"lastModified": "2025-04-11T00:51:21.963",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"integrityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 10.0,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": true
}
]
},
"published": "2012-09-06T21:55:03.143",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692856"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/47855"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52864"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74554"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692856"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/47855"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52864"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74554"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-119"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…