FKIE_CVE-2012-5588

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2012-12-26 17:55 - Updated: 2025-04-11 00:51
Severity ?
Summary
The Email Field module 6.x-1.x before 6.x-1.3 for Drupal, when using a field permission module and the field contact field formatter is set to the full or teaser display mode, does not properly check permissions, which allows remote attackers to email the stored address via unspecified vectors.
References
secalert@redhat.comhttp://drupal.org/node/1852612Patch
secalert@redhat.comhttp://drupal.org/node/1853214Patch, Vendor Advisory
secalert@redhat.comhttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/29/2
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://drupal.org/node/1852612Patch
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://drupal.org/node/1853214Patch, Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/29/2
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
epiqo email 6.x-1.0
epiqo email 6.x-1.0
epiqo email 6.x-1.1
epiqo email 6.x-1.2
epiqo email 6.x-1.x
drupal drupal -
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:epiqo:email:6.x-1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "B6EB3FB6-5AB6-4A82-92AE-84DC111A30F2",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:epiqo:email:6.x-1.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "4B8A0C0B-A1E1-455E-8AC8-5574350DFDE7",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:epiqo:email:6.x-1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "2D1DFB2D-8E5B-46C4-902A-AD303CD86BEC",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:epiqo:email:6.x-1.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "CD2A121F-00E5-4F83-B600-10AFB6E0D188",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:epiqo:email:6.x-1.x:dev:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "7D0DE333-B43B-4123-866F-522D4A265B59",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        },
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:drupal:drupal:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "F8B1170D-AD33-4C7A-892D-63AC71B032CF",
              "vulnerable": false
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ],
      "operator": "AND"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The Email Field module 6.x-1.x before 6.x-1.3 for Drupal, when using a field permission module and the field contact field formatter is set to the full or teaser display mode, does not properly check permissions, which allows remote attackers to email the stored address via unspecified vectors."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El m\u00f3dulo Email Field v6.x-1.x antes de v6.x-1.3 para Drupal, cuando se utiliza un m\u00f3dulo de permisos de campos y el formateador de campos de contacto esta puesto a modo de pantalla completa o teaser, no comprueba correctamente los permisos, lo que permite a atacantes remotos a enviar por correo electr\u00f3nico la direcci\u00f3n almacenada a trav\u00e9s de vectores no especificados.\r\n"
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2012-5588",
  "lastModified": "2025-04-11T00:51:21.963",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "LOW",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "HIGH",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 2.6,
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 4.9,
        "impactScore": 2.9,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2012-12-26T17:55:02.283",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "http://drupal.org/node/1852612"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "tags": [
        "Patch",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://drupal.org/node/1853214"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/29/2"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "http://drupal.org/node/1852612"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Patch",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://drupal.org/node/1853214"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/29/2"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-264"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.