FKIE_CVE-2013-7311

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2014-01-23 17:55 - Updated: 2025-04-11 00:51
Severity ?
Summary
The OSPF implementation in Check Point Gaia OS R75.X and R76 and IPSO OS 6.2 R75.X and R76 does not consider the possibility of duplicate Link State ID values in Link State Advertisement (LSA) packets before performing operations on the LSA database, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (routing disruption) or obtain sensitive packet information via a crafted LSA packet, a related issue to CVE-2013-0149.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/229804US Government Resource
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/BLUU-985QRCUS Government Resource
cve@mitre.orghttps://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&solutionid=sk94490Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/229804US Government Resource
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/BLUU-985QRCUS Government Resource
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&solutionid=sk94490Vendor Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
checkpoint gaia_os r75.0
checkpoint gaia_os r76.0
checkpoint ipso_os 6.2
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:checkpoint:gaia_os:r75.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "108B6F13-FD59-4790-B873-EED143387841",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:checkpoint:gaia_os:r76.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "6D082271-E8DE-445C-99AA-A04D8789110F",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:checkpoint:ipso_os:6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "89AC8A11-E5F4-4614-9C9D-65122AF92A97",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The OSPF implementation in Check Point Gaia OS R75.X and R76 and IPSO OS 6.2 R75.X and R76 does not consider the possibility of duplicate Link State ID values in Link State Advertisement (LSA) packets before performing operations on the LSA database, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (routing disruption) or obtain sensitive packet information via a crafted LSA packet, a related issue to CVE-2013-0149."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "La implementaci\u00f3n OSPF en Check Point Gaia OS R75.X y R76 e IPSO OS 6.2 R75.X y R76 no considera la posibilidad de valores Link State ID duplicados en paquetes Link State Advertisement (LSA) antes de realizar operaciones en la base de datos LSA, lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (interrupci\u00f3n de enrutamiento) u obtener informaci\u00f3n sensible de paquetes a trav\u00e9s de un paquete LSA manipulado, una vulnerabilidad relacionada con CVE-2013-0149."
    }
  ],
  "evaluatorComment": "Per: http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/694.html\n\n\"CWE-694: Use of Multiple Resources with Duplicate Identifier\"",
  "id": "CVE-2013-7311",
  "lastModified": "2025-04-11T00:51:21.963",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
          "accessVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "baseScore": 5.4,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 5.5,
        "impactScore": 6.4,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2014-01-23T17:55:05.477",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "US Government Resource"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/229804"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "US Government Resource"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/BLUU-985QRC"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=\u0026solutionid=sk94490"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "US Government Resource"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/229804"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "US Government Resource"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/BLUU-985QRC"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=\u0026solutionid=sk94490"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "NVD-CWE-Other"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.