FKIE_CVE-2014-0865

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2014-07-07 11:01 - Updated: 2026-06-17 00:03
Severity
Summary
RICOS in IBM Algo Credit Limits (aka ACLM) 4.5.0 through 4.7.0 before 4.7.0.03 FP5 in IBM Algorithmics relies on client-side input validation, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended dual-control restrictions and modify data via crafted serialized objects, as demonstrated by limit manipulations.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
ibm algo_credit_limits 4.5.0
ibm algo_credit_limits 4.7.0
ibm algorithmics -

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:algo_credit_limits:4.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "903D1B5E-A7CF-4D2C-ACF6-56A0A7CAF383",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:algo_credit_limits:4.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "DF49CDB6-BCF2-4E17-A079-2B8C27BBD39A",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:algorithmics:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "F9BFFBEC-64CD-44E0-A8FF-A06A2A6BF039",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "RICOS in IBM Algo Credit Limits (aka ACLM) 4.5.0 through 4.7.0 before 4.7.0.03 FP5 in IBM Algorithmics relies on client-side input validation, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended dual-control restrictions and modify data via crafted serialized objects, as demonstrated by limit manipulations."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "RICOS en IBM Algo Credit Limits (tambi\u00e9n conocido como ACLM) 4.5.0 hasta 4.7.0 anterior a 4.7.0.03 FP5 en IBM Algorithmics depende de la validaci\u00f3n del cliente para entradas, lo que permite a usuarios remotos autenticados evadir las restricciones de control dual y modificar datos a trav\u00e9s de objetos serializados manipulados, tal y como fue demostrado por manipulaciones de l\u00edmites."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2014-0865",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T00:03:45.327",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "SINGLE",
          "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "baseScore": 4.9,
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:P",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 6.8,
        "impactScore": 4.9,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2014-07-07T11:01:28.777",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/127304/IBM-Algorithmics-RICOS-Disclosure-XSS-CSRF.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Jun/173"
    },
    {
      "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/59296"
    },
    {
      "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
      "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21675881"
    },
    {
      "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/532598/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/90939"
    },
    {
      "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
      "url": "https://www.sec-consult.com/fxdata/seccons/prod/temedia/advisories_txt/20140630-0_IBM_Algorithmics_RICOS_multiple_vulnerabilities_v10.txt"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/127304/IBM-Algorithmics-RICOS-Disclosure-XSS-CSRF.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Jun/173"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/59296"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21675881"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/532598/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/90939"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://www.sec-consult.com/fxdata/seccons/prod/temedia/advisories_txt/20140630-0_IBM_Algorithmics_RICOS_multiple_vulnerabilities_v10.txt"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-20"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…