FKIE_CVE-2015-20112
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-06-29 21:15 - Updated: 2025-06-30 18:38
Severity ?
Summary
RLPx 5 has two CTR streams based on the same key, IV, and nonce. This can facilitate decryption on a private network.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RLPx 5 has two CTR streams based on the same key, IV, and nonce. This can facilitate decryption on a private network."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "RLPx 5 cuenta con dos flujos CTR basados en la misma clave, IV y nonce. Esto facilita el descifrado en una red privada."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2015-20112",
"lastModified": "2025-06-30T18:38:23.493",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.4,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.6,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-06-29T21:15:22.210",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://github.com/LaurentMT/go-ethereum/commit/e8cba7283b57280b1bcf5761478f852398365901"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://github.com/ethereum/devp2p/blob/master/rlpx.md#known-issues-in-the-current-version"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://github.com/ethereum/devp2p/issues/32"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/issues/1315"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://github.com/hyperledger/besu/issues/7926"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-325"
}
],
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…