FKIE_CVE-2015-6303

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2015-09-24 14:59 - Updated: 2025-04-12 10:46
Severity ?
Summary
The Cisco Spark application 2015-07-04 for mobile operating systems does not properly verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate, aka Bug IDs CSCut36742 and CSCut36844.
References
psirt@cisco.comhttp://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=41127Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=41127Vendor Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
cisco spark 2015-07-04_base
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:spark:2015-07-04_base:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "F0C4934C-6E45-4769-AE3A-CAD197B247B3",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The Cisco Spark application 2015-07-04 for mobile operating systems does not properly verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate, aka Bug IDs CSCut36742 and CSCut36844."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Vulnerabilidad en la aplicaci\u00f3n 2015-07-04 de Cisco Spark para sistemas operativos m\u00f3viles, no verifica correctamente los certificados X.509 de servidores SSL, lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle suplantar los servidores y obtener informaci\u00f3n sensible a trav\u00e9s de un certificado manipulado, tambi\u00e9n conocida como Bug IDs CSCut36742 y CSCut36844."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2015-6303",
  "lastModified": "2025-04-12T10:46:40.837",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 4.3,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
        "impactScore": 2.9,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2015-09-24T14:59:00.123",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "psirt@cisco.com",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=41127"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=41127"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "psirt@cisco.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-200"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.