FKIE_CVE-2015-8329
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2015-11-24 20:59 - Updated: 2025-04-12 10:46
Severity ?
Summary
SAP Manufacturing Integration and Intelligence (aka MII, formerly xMII) uses weak encryption (Base64 and DES), which allows attackers to conduct downgrade attacks and decrypt passwords via unspecified vectors, aka SAP Security Note 2240274.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| sap | manufacturing_integration_and_intelligence | 12.2 | |
| sap | manufacturing_integration_and_intelligence | 14.0 | |
| sap | manufacturing_integration_and_intelligence | 15.0 |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:sap:manufacturing_integration_and_intelligence:12.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "1273F8D1-D4F4-4D73-B068-FC83053D1436",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:sap:manufacturing_integration_and_intelligence:14.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "ADCD48D2-4E00-4544-8846-DC45AD748342",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:sap:manufacturing_integration_and_intelligence:15.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E49597EA-582C-4F2C-8D30-760620BA9FA6",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "SAP Manufacturing Integration and Intelligence (aka MII, formerly xMII) uses weak encryption (Base64 and DES), which allows attackers to conduct downgrade attacks and decrypt passwords via unspecified vectors, aka SAP Security Note 2240274."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "SAP Manufacturing Integration and Intelligence (tambi\u00e9n conocida como MII, anteriormente xMII), utiliza un cifrado d\u00e9bil (Base64 y DES),lo que permite a atacantes llevar a cabo ataques de bajada de versi\u00f3n y descifrar contrase\u00f1as a trav\u00e9s de vectores no especificados, tambi\u00e9n conocida como SAP Security Note 2240274."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2015-8329",
"lastModified": "2025-04-12T10:46:40.837",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": true,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
]
},
"published": "2015-11-24T20:59:24.757",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/135761/SAP-MII-12.2-14.0-15.0-Cryptography-Issues.html"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Feb/68"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://erpscan.io/advisories/erpscan-15-031-using-base64-and-des-in-sap-mii/"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/135761/SAP-MII-12.2-14.0-15.0-Cryptography-Issues.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Feb/68"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://erpscan.io/advisories/erpscan-15-031-using-base64-and-des-in-sap-mii/"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-310"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…