FKIE_CVE-2018-3759
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2018-06-13 15:29 - Updated: 2024-11-21 04:06
Severity ?
Summary
private_address_check ruby gem before 0.5.0 is vulnerable to a time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition due to the address the socket uses not being checked. DNS entries with a TTL of 0 can trigger this case where the initial resolution is a public address but the subsequent resolution is a private address.
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| support@hackerone.com | https://github.com/jtdowney/private_address_check/commit/4068228187db87fea7577f7020099399772bb147 | Patch, Third Party Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://github.com/jtdowney/private_address_check/commit/4068228187db87fea7577f7020099399772bb147 | Patch, Third Party Advisory |
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| private_address_check_project | private_address_check | * |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:private_address_check_project:private_address_check:*:*:*:*:*:ruby:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6FCBC921-366D-465C-9171-A5F2101A6078",
"versionEndExcluding": "0.5.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "private_address_check ruby gem before 0.5.0 is vulnerable to a time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition due to the address the socket uses not being checked. DNS entries with a TTL of 0 can trigger this case where the initial resolution is a public address but the subsequent resolution is a private address."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "La gema de Ruby private_address_check en versiones anteriores a la 0.5.0 es vulnerable a una condici\u00f3n de carrera TOCTOU (time-of-check time-of-use) debido a que no se comprueba la direcci\u00f3n empleada por el socket. Las entradas DNS con un TLL de 0 pueden desencadenar este caso donde la resoluci\u00f3n inicial es una direcci\u00f3n p\u00fablica, pero la siguiente es una direcci\u00f3n privada."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2018-3759",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T04:06:01.377",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV30": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.7,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2018-06-13T15:29:00.267",
"references": [
{
"source": "support@hackerone.com",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/jtdowney/private_address_check/commit/4068228187db87fea7577f7020099399772bb147"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/jtdowney/private_address_check/commit/4068228187db87fea7577f7020099399772bb147"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "support@hackerone.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-362"
}
],
"source": "support@hackerone.com",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-362"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…