FKIE_CVE-2021-24843
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2022-02-07 16:15 - Updated: 2024-11-21 05:53
Severity ?
Summary
The SupportCandy WordPress plugin before 2.2.7 does not have CRSF check in its wpsc_tickets AJAX action, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin call it and delete arbitrary tickets via the set_delete_permanently_bulk_ticket setting_action.
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| contact@wpscan.com | https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/b71f53d7-6b9e-458c-8754-576ad2a52f7d | Exploit, Third Party Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/b71f53d7-6b9e-458c-8754-576ad2a52f7d | Exploit, Third Party Advisory |
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| supportcandy | supportcandy | * |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:supportcandy:supportcandy:*:*:*:*:*:wordpress:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FA18C347-55CA-4C4E-B366-E636427A241D",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.2.7",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The SupportCandy WordPress plugin before 2.2.7 does not have CRSF check in its wpsc_tickets AJAX action, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin call it and delete arbitrary tickets via the set_delete_permanently_bulk_ticket setting_action."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "El plugin SupportCandy de WordPress versiones anteriores a 2.2.7, no presenta una comprobaci\u00f3n CRSF en su acci\u00f3n AJAX wpsc_tickets, lo que podr\u00eda permitir a atacantes hacer que un administrador con sesi\u00f3n iniciada la llame y elimine tickets arbitrarios por medio de set_delete_permanently_bulk_ticket setting_action"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2021-24843",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T05:53:52.360",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2022-02-07T16:15:42.060",
"references": [
{
"source": "contact@wpscan.com",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/b71f53d7-6b9e-458c-8754-576ad2a52f7d"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/b71f53d7-6b9e-458c-8754-576ad2a52f7d"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "contact@wpscan.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-352"
}
],
"source": "contact@wpscan.com",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-352"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…