fkie_cve-2021-43557
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2021-11-22 09:15
Modified
2024-11-21 06:29
Severity ?
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Summary
The uri-block plugin in Apache APISIX before 2.10.2 uses $request_uri without verification. The $request_uri is the full original request URI without normalization. This makes it possible to construct a URI to bypass the block list on some occasions. For instance, when the block list contains "^/internal/", a URI like `//internal/` can be used to bypass it. Some other plugins also have the same issue. And it may affect the developer's custom plugin.
References
security@apache.orghttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/22/1Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
security@apache.orghttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/22/2Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
security@apache.orghttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/23/1Exploit, Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
security@apache.orghttps://lists.apache.org/thread/18jyd458ptocr31rnkjs71w4h366mv7hExploit, Mailing List, Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/22/1Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/22/2Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/23/1Exploit, Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://lists.apache.org/thread/18jyd458ptocr31rnkjs71w4h366mv7hExploit, Mailing List, Vendor Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
apache apisix *


To clipboard 

{
   configurations: [
      {
         nodes: [
            {
               cpeMatch: [
                  {
                     criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:apache:apisix:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                     matchCriteriaId: "E6E300E2-7036-4813-B7A7-48F922753C76",
                     versionEndExcluding: "2.10.2",
                     vulnerable: true,
                  },
               ],
               negate: false,
               operator: "OR",
            },
         ],
      },
   ],
   cveTags: [],
   descriptions: [
      {
         lang: "en",
         value: "The uri-block plugin in Apache APISIX before 2.10.2 uses $request_uri without verification. The $request_uri is the full original request URI without normalization. This makes it possible to construct a URI to bypass the block list on some occasions. For instance, when the block list contains \"^/internal/\", a URI like `//internal/` can be used to bypass it. Some other plugins also have the same issue. And it may affect the developer's custom plugin.",
      },
      {
         lang: "es",
         value: "El plugin uri-block en Apache APISIX versiones anteriores a 2.10.2, usa $request_uri sin verificación. La $request_uri es la URI original completa de la petición sin normalizar. Esto hace posible construir un URI para evitar la lista de bloqueo en algunas ocasiones. Por ejemplo, cuando la lista de bloqueo contiene \"^/internal/\", puede usarse una URI como \"//internal/\" para omitirla. Algunos otros plugins también presentan el mismo problema. Y puede afectar al plugin personalizado del desarrollador",
      },
   ],
   id: "CVE-2021-43557",
   lastModified: "2024-11-21T06:29:25.887",
   metrics: {
      cvssMetricV2: [
         {
            acInsufInfo: false,
            baseSeverity: "MEDIUM",
            cvssData: {
               accessComplexity: "LOW",
               accessVector: "NETWORK",
               authentication: "NONE",
               availabilityImpact: "NONE",
               baseScore: 5,
               confidentialityImpact: "PARTIAL",
               integrityImpact: "NONE",
               vectorString: "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
               version: "2.0",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 10,
            impactScore: 2.9,
            obtainAllPrivilege: false,
            obtainOtherPrivilege: false,
            obtainUserPrivilege: false,
            source: "nvd@nist.gov",
            type: "Primary",
            userInteractionRequired: false,
         },
      ],
      cvssMetricV31: [
         {
            cvssData: {
               attackComplexity: "LOW",
               attackVector: "NETWORK",
               availabilityImpact: "NONE",
               baseScore: 7.5,
               baseSeverity: "HIGH",
               confidentialityImpact: "HIGH",
               integrityImpact: "NONE",
               privilegesRequired: "NONE",
               scope: "UNCHANGED",
               userInteraction: "NONE",
               vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
               version: "3.1",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 3.9,
            impactScore: 3.6,
            source: "nvd@nist.gov",
            type: "Primary",
         },
      ],
   },
   published: "2021-11-22T09:15:07.627",
   references: [
      {
         source: "security@apache.org",
         tags: [
            "Mailing List",
            "Third Party Advisory",
         ],
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/22/1",
      },
      {
         source: "security@apache.org",
         tags: [
            "Mailing List",
            "Third Party Advisory",
         ],
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/22/2",
      },
      {
         source: "security@apache.org",
         tags: [
            "Exploit",
            "Mailing List",
            "Third Party Advisory",
         ],
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/23/1",
      },
      {
         source: "security@apache.org",
         tags: [
            "Exploit",
            "Mailing List",
            "Vendor Advisory",
         ],
         url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread/18jyd458ptocr31rnkjs71w4h366mv7h",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         tags: [
            "Mailing List",
            "Third Party Advisory",
         ],
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/22/1",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         tags: [
            "Mailing List",
            "Third Party Advisory",
         ],
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/22/2",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         tags: [
            "Exploit",
            "Mailing List",
            "Third Party Advisory",
         ],
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/23/1",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         tags: [
            "Exploit",
            "Mailing List",
            "Vendor Advisory",
         ],
         url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread/18jyd458ptocr31rnkjs71w4h366mv7h",
      },
   ],
   sourceIdentifier: "security@apache.org",
   vulnStatus: "Modified",
   weaknesses: [
      {
         description: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "CWE-77",
            },
         ],
         source: "nvd@nist.gov",
         type: "Primary",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.