FKIE_CVE-2022-38846

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2022-09-16 14:15 - Updated: 2024-11-21 07:17
Severity ?
5.9 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Summary
EspoCRM version 7.1.8 is vulnerable to Missing Secure Flag allowing the browser to send plain text cookies over an insecure channel (HTTP). An attacker may capture the cookie from the insecure channel using MITM attack.
References
cve@mitre.orghttps://medium.com/cybersecurity-valuelabs/espocrm-7-1-8-is-vulnerable-to-missing-secure-flag-1664bac5ffe4Exploit, Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://medium.com/cybersecurity-valuelabs/espocrm-7-1-8-is-vulnerable-to-missing-secure-flag-1664bac5ffe4Exploit, Third Party Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
espocrm espocrm 7.1.8
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:espocrm:espocrm:7.1.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "D43B363E-F815-45B5-9012-8DA44D92F0FC",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "EspoCRM version 7.1.8 is vulnerable to Missing Secure Flag allowing the browser to send plain text cookies over an insecure channel (HTTP). An attacker may capture the cookie from the insecure channel using MITM attack."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "EspoCRM versi\u00f3n 7.1.8, es vulnerable a Un Flag de Seguridad Faltante que permite al navegador enviar cookies de texto plano a trav\u00e9s de un canal inseguro (HTTP). Un atacante puede capturar la cookie desde el canal inseguro usando un ataque MITM"
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2022-38846",
  "lastModified": "2024-11-21T07:17:10.150",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 5.9,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2022-09-16T14:15:09.670",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://medium.com/cybersecurity-valuelabs/espocrm-7-1-8-is-vulnerable-to-missing-secure-flag-1664bac5ffe4"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://medium.com/cybersecurity-valuelabs/espocrm-7-1-8-is-vulnerable-to-missing-secure-flag-1664bac5ffe4"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-319"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.