FKIE_CVE-2022-50253
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-09-15 14:15 - Updated: 2025-11-26 16:26
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: make sure skb->len != 0 when redirecting to a tunneling device
syzkaller managed to trigger another case where skb->len == 0
when we enter __dev_queue_xmit:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2470 at include/linux/skbuff.h:2576 skb_assert_len include/linux/skbuff.h:2576 [inline]
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2470 at include/linux/skbuff.h:2576 __dev_queue_xmit+0x2069/0x35e0 net/core/dev.c:4295
Call Trace:
dev_queue_xmit+0x17/0x20 net/core/dev.c:4406
__bpf_tx_skb net/core/filter.c:2115 [inline]
__bpf_redirect_no_mac net/core/filter.c:2140 [inline]
__bpf_redirect+0x5fb/0xda0 net/core/filter.c:2163
____bpf_clone_redirect net/core/filter.c:2447 [inline]
bpf_clone_redirect+0x247/0x390 net/core/filter.c:2419
bpf_prog_48159a89cb4a9a16+0x59/0x5e
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:897 [inline]
__bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:596 [inline]
bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:603 [inline]
bpf_test_run+0x46c/0x890 net/bpf/test_run.c:402
bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0xbdc/0x14c0 net/bpf/test_run.c:1170
bpf_prog_test_run+0x345/0x3c0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3648
__sys_bpf+0x43a/0x6c0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5005
__do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5091 [inline]
__se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5089 [inline]
__x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5089
do_syscall_64+0x54/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:48
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6
The reproducer doesn't really reproduce outside of syzkaller
environment, so I'm taking a guess here. It looks like we
do generate correct ETH_HLEN-sized packet, but we redirect
the packet to the tunneling device. Before we do so, we
__skb_pull l2 header and arrive again at skb->len == 0.
Doesn't seem like we can do anything better than having
an explicit check after __skb_pull?
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "201B76DB-8AF9-4EC9-BE08-907DEFA3435E",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.14.303",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "AE8904A3-99BE-4E49-9682-1F90A6373F4F",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.270",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.15",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A0C0D95E-414A-445E-941B-3EF6A4D3A093",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.229",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.20",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "D05D31FC-BD74-4F9E-B1D8-9CED62BE6F65",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.163",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "47237296-55D1-4ED4-8075-D00FC85A61EE",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.86",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C720A569-3D93-4D77-95F6-E2B3A3267D9F",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.0.16",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "77239F4B-6BB2-4B9E-A654-36A52396116C",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.1",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: make sure skb-\u003elen != 0 when redirecting to a tunneling device\n\nsyzkaller managed to trigger another case where skb-\u003elen == 0\nwhen we enter __dev_queue_xmit:\n\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2470 at include/linux/skbuff.h:2576 skb_assert_len include/linux/skbuff.h:2576 [inline]\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2470 at include/linux/skbuff.h:2576 __dev_queue_xmit+0x2069/0x35e0 net/core/dev.c:4295\n\nCall Trace:\n dev_queue_xmit+0x17/0x20 net/core/dev.c:4406\n __bpf_tx_skb net/core/filter.c:2115 [inline]\n __bpf_redirect_no_mac net/core/filter.c:2140 [inline]\n __bpf_redirect+0x5fb/0xda0 net/core/filter.c:2163\n ____bpf_clone_redirect net/core/filter.c:2447 [inline]\n bpf_clone_redirect+0x247/0x390 net/core/filter.c:2419\n bpf_prog_48159a89cb4a9a16+0x59/0x5e\n bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:897 [inline]\n __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:596 [inline]\n bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:603 [inline]\n bpf_test_run+0x46c/0x890 net/bpf/test_run.c:402\n bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0xbdc/0x14c0 net/bpf/test_run.c:1170\n bpf_prog_test_run+0x345/0x3c0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3648\n __sys_bpf+0x43a/0x6c0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5005\n __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5091 [inline]\n __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5089 [inline]\n __x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5089\n do_syscall_64+0x54/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:48\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6\n\nThe reproducer doesn\u0027t really reproduce outside of syzkaller\nenvironment, so I\u0027m taking a guess here. It looks like we\ndo generate correct ETH_HLEN-sized packet, but we redirect\nthe packet to the tunneling device. Before we do so, we\n__skb_pull l2 header and arrive again at skb-\u003elen == 0.\nDoesn\u0027t seem like we can do anything better than having\nan explicit check after __skb_pull?"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2022-50253",
"lastModified": "2025-11-26T16:26:21.480",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-09-15T14:15:36.007",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/07ec7b502800ba9f7b8b15cb01dd6556bb41aaca"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1b65704b8c08ae92db29f720d3b298031131da53"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5d3f4478d22b2cb1810f6fe0f797411e9d87b3e5"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6d935a02658be82585ecb39aab339faa84496650"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/772431f30ca040cfbf31b791d468bac6a9ca74d3"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e6a63203e5a90a39392fa1a7ffc60f5e9baf642a"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f186303845a01cc7e991f9dc51d7e5a3cdc7aedb"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ffbccc5fb0a67424e12f7f8da210c04c8063f797"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…