FKIE_CVE-2022-50616

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-12-08 02:15 - Updated: 2025-12-08 18:26
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: regulator: core: Use different devices for resource allocation and DT lookup Following by the below discussion, there's the potential UAF issue between regulator and mfd. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221128143601.1698148-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com/ From the analysis of Yingliang CPU A |CPU B mt6370_probe() | devm_mfd_add_devices() | |mt6370_regulator_probe() | regulator_register() | //allocate init_data and add it to devres | regulator_of_get_init_data() i2c_unregister_device() | device_del() | devres_release_all() | // init_data is freed | release_nodes() | | // using init_data causes UAF | regulator_register() It's common to use mfd core to create child device for the regulator. In order to do the DT lookup for init data, the child that registered the regulator would pass its parent as the parameter. And this causes init data resource allocated to its parent, not itself. The issue happen when parent device is going to release and regulator core is still doing some operation of init data constraint for the regulator of child device. To fix it, this patch expand 'regulator_register' API to use the different devices for init data allocation and DT lookup.
References
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f3cbcd6b440032ebc7f7d48a1689dcc70a4eb98
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b0f25ca1ff9be7abd1679ae7e59a8f25dbffe67a
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cb29811d989bcb7ea81ca111c4b13878b344e086
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nregulator: core: Use different devices for resource allocation and DT lookup\n\nFollowing by the below discussion, there\u0027s the potential UAF issue\nbetween regulator and mfd.\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/all/20221128143601.1698148-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com/\n\nFrom the analysis of Yingliang\n\nCPU A\t\t\t\t|CPU B\nmt6370_probe()\t\t\t|\n  devm_mfd_add_devices()\t|\n\t\t\t\t|mt6370_regulator_probe()\n\t\t\t\t|  regulator_register()\n\t\t\t\t|    //allocate init_data and add it to devres\n\t\t\t\t|    regulator_of_get_init_data()\ni2c_unregister_device()\t\t|\n  device_del()\t\t\t|\n    devres_release_all()\t|\n      // init_data is freed\t|\n      release_nodes()\t\t|\n\t\t\t\t|  // using init_data causes UAF\n\t\t\t\t|  regulator_register()\n\nIt\u0027s common to use mfd core to create child device for the regulator.\nIn order to do the DT lookup for init data, the child that registered\nthe regulator would pass its parent as the parameter. And this causes\ninit data resource allocated to its parent, not itself. The issue happen\nwhen parent device is going to release and regulator core is still doing\nsome operation of init data constraint for the regulator of child device.\n\nTo fix it, this patch expand \u0027regulator_register\u0027 API to use the\ndifferent devices for init data allocation and DT lookup."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2022-50616",
  "lastModified": "2025-12-08T18:26:19.900",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2025-12-08T02:15:47.330",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f3cbcd6b440032ebc7f7d48a1689dcc70a4eb98"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b0f25ca1ff9be7abd1679ae7e59a8f25dbffe67a"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cb29811d989bcb7ea81ca111c4b13878b344e086"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.