FKIE_CVE-2023-23913

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-01-09 01:15 - Updated: 2026-04-15 00:35
Severity
6.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Summary
There is a potential DOM based cross-site scripting issue in rails-ujs which leverages the Clipboard API to target HTML elements that are assigned the contenteditable attribute. This has the potential to occur when pasting malicious HTML content from the clipboard that includes a data-method, data-remote or data-disable-with attribute.
References
support@hackerone.comhttps://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033263
support@hackerone.comhttps://discuss.rubyonrails.org/t/cve-2023-23913-dom-based-cross-site-scripting-in-rails-ujs-for-contenteditable-html-elements/82468
support@hackerone.comhttps://github.com/rails/rails/commit/5037a13614d71727af8a175063bcf6ba1a74bdbd
support@hackerone.comhttps://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240605-0007/
support@hackerone.comhttps://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5389
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "There is a potential DOM based cross-site scripting issue in rails-ujs which leverages the Clipboard API to target HTML elements that are assigned the contenteditable attribute. This has the potential to occur when pasting malicious HTML content from the clipboard that includes a data-method, data-remote or data-disable-with attribute."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Existe un problema potencial de Cross-Site Scripting basado en DOM en rails-ujs que aprovecha la API del portapapeles para apuntar a elementos HTML a los que se les asigna el atributo contenteditable. Esto puede ocurrir al pegar contenido HTML malicioso desde el portapapeles que incluye un atributo data-method, data-remote o data-disable-with."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2023-23913",
  "lastModified": "2026-04-15T00:35:42.020",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 6.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 3.4,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-01-09T01:15:07.257",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "support@hackerone.com",
      "url": "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033263"
    },
    {
      "source": "support@hackerone.com",
      "url": "https://discuss.rubyonrails.org/t/cve-2023-23913-dom-based-cross-site-scripting-in-rails-ujs-for-contenteditable-html-elements/82468"
    },
    {
      "source": "support@hackerone.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/5037a13614d71727af8a175063bcf6ba1a74bdbd"
    },
    {
      "source": "support@hackerone.com",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240605-0007/"
    },
    {
      "source": "support@hackerone.com",
      "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5389"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "support@hackerone.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-79"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.