FKIE_CVE-2023-40743
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2023-09-05 15:15 - Updated: 2025-02-13 17:17
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** When integrating Apache Axis 1.x in an application, it may not have been obvious that looking up a service through "ServiceFactory.getService" allows potentially dangerous lookup mechanisms such as LDAP. When passing untrusted input to this API method, this could expose the application to DoS, SSRF and even attacks leading to RCE.
As Axis 1 has been EOL we recommend you migrate to a different SOAP engine, such as Apache Axis 2/Java. As a workaround, you may review your code to verify no untrusted or unsanitized input is passed to "ServiceFactory.getService", or by applying the patch from https://github.com/apache/axis-axis1-java/commit/7e66753427466590d6def0125e448d2791723210 . The Apache Axis project does not expect to create an Axis 1.x release fixing this problem, though contributors that would like to work towards this are welcome.
References
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:axis:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "28772E39-4100-404C-8274-8A4FF7DDF588",
"versionEndExcluding": "2023-08-01",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [
{
"sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"unsupported-when-assigned"
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** When integrating Apache Axis 1.x in an application, it may not have been obvious that looking up a service through \"ServiceFactory.getService\" allows potentially dangerous lookup mechanisms such as LDAP. When passing untrusted input to this API method, this could expose the application to DoS, SSRF and even attacks leading to RCE.\n\nAs Axis 1 has been EOL we recommend you migrate to a different SOAP engine, such as Apache Axis 2/Java. As a workaround, you may review your code to verify no untrusted or unsanitized input is passed to \"ServiceFactory.getService\", or by applying the patch from https://github.com/apache/axis-axis1-java/commit/7e66753427466590d6def0125e448d2791723210 . The Apache Axis project does not expect to create an Axis 1.x release fixing this problem, though contributors that would like to work towards this are welcome."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "** NO SOPORTADO CUANDO EST\u00c9 ASIGNADO ** ** NO SOPORTADO CUANDO EST\u00c9 ASIGNADO ** Al integrar Apache Axis 1.x en una aplicaci\u00f3n, puede que no haya sido obvio que buscar un servicio a trav\u00e9s de \"ServiceFactory.getService\" permita mecanismos de b\u00fasqueda potencialmente peligrosos como LDAP . Al pasar entradas que no son de confianza a este m\u00e9todo API, esto podr\u00eda exponer la aplicaci\u00f3n a DoS, SSRF e incluso ataques que conduzcan a RCE. Como Axis 1 ha estado en EOL, le recomendamos migrar a un motor SOAP diferente, como Apache Axis 2/Java. Como workaround, puede revisar su c\u00f3digo para verificar que no se pase ninguna entrada que no sea de confianza o no sanitizada a \"ServiceFactory.getService\", o aplicando el parche desde https://github.com/apache/axis-axis1-java/commit/7e66753427466590d6def0125e448d2791723210. El proyecto Apache Axis no espera crear una versi\u00f3n Axis 1.x que solucione este problema, aunque los contribuyentes que deseen trabajar para lograrlo son bienvenidos."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-40743",
"lastModified": "2025-02-13T17:17:05.030",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2023-09-05T15:15:42.687",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/apache/axis-axis1-java/commit/7e66753427466590d6def0125e448d2791723210"
},
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/gs0qgk2mgss7zfhzdd6ftfjvm4kp7v82"
},
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/10/msg00025.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/apache/axis-axis1-java/commit/7e66753427466590d6def0125e448d2791723210"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/gs0qgk2mgss7zfhzdd6ftfjvm4kp7v82"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/10/msg00025.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-20"
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org",
"type": "Primary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-75"
}
],
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…