FKIE_CVE-2023-53809

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-12-09 01:16 - Updated: 2025-12-09 18:37
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: l2tp: Avoid possible recursive deadlock in l2tp_tunnel_register() When a file descriptor of pppol2tp socket is passed as file descriptor of UDP socket, a recursive deadlock occurs in l2tp_tunnel_register(). This situation is reproduced by the following program: int main(void) { int sock; struct sockaddr_pppol2tp addr; sock = socket(AF_PPPOX, SOCK_DGRAM, PX_PROTO_OL2TP); if (sock < 0) { perror("socket"); return 1; } addr.sa_family = AF_PPPOX; addr.sa_protocol = PX_PROTO_OL2TP; addr.pppol2tp.pid = 0; addr.pppol2tp.fd = sock; addr.pppol2tp.addr.sin_family = PF_INET; addr.pppol2tp.addr.sin_port = htons(0); addr.pppol2tp.addr.sin_addr.s_addr = inet_addr("192.168.0.1"); addr.pppol2tp.s_tunnel = 1; addr.pppol2tp.s_session = 0; addr.pppol2tp.d_tunnel = 0; addr.pppol2tp.d_session = 0; if (connect(sock, (const struct sockaddr *)&addr, sizeof(addr)) < 0) { perror("connect"); return 1; } return 0; } This program causes the following lockdep warning: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.2.0-rc5-00205-gc96618275234 #56 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- repro/8607 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880213c8130 (sk_lock-AF_PPPOX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: l2tp_tunnel_register+0x2b7/0x11c0 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880213c8130 (sk_lock-AF_PPPOX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: pppol2tp_connect+0xa82/0x1a30 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(sk_lock-AF_PPPOX); lock(sk_lock-AF_PPPOX); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 1 lock held by repro/8607: #0: ffff8880213c8130 (sk_lock-AF_PPPOX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: pppol2tp_connect+0xa82/0x1a30 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 8607 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.2.0-rc5-00205-gc96618275234 #56 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.1-2.fc37 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x100/0x178 __lock_acquire.cold+0x119/0x3b9 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x410/0x410 lock_acquire+0x1e0/0x610 ? l2tp_tunnel_register+0x2b7/0x11c0 ? lock_downgrade+0x710/0x710 ? __fget_files+0x283/0x3e0 lock_sock_nested+0x3a/0xf0 ? l2tp_tunnel_register+0x2b7/0x11c0 l2tp_tunnel_register+0x2b7/0x11c0 ? sprintf+0xc4/0x100 ? l2tp_tunnel_del_work+0x6b0/0x6b0 ? debug_object_deactivate+0x320/0x320 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x16d/0x7a0 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x16d/0x7a0 ? l2tp_tunnel_create+0x2bf/0x4b0 ? l2tp_tunnel_create+0x3c6/0x4b0 pppol2tp_connect+0x14e1/0x1a30 ? pppol2tp_put_sk+0xd0/0xd0 ? aa_sk_perm+0x2b7/0xa80 ? aa_af_perm+0x260/0x260 ? bpf_lsm_socket_connect+0x9/0x10 ? pppol2tp_put_sk+0xd0/0xd0 __sys_connect_file+0x14f/0x190 __sys_connect+0x133/0x160 ? __sys_connect_file+0x190/0x190 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100 ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0x1b7/0x200 ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0x147/0x200 ? __audit_syscall_entry+0x396/0x500 __x64_sys_connect+0x72/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd This patch fixes the issue by getting/creating the tunnel before locking the pppol2tp socket.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nl2tp: Avoid possible recursive deadlock in l2tp_tunnel_register()\n\nWhen a file descriptor of pppol2tp socket is passed as file descriptor\nof UDP socket, a recursive deadlock occurs in l2tp_tunnel_register().\nThis situation is reproduced by the following program:\n\nint main(void)\n{\n\tint sock;\n\tstruct sockaddr_pppol2tp addr;\n\n\tsock = socket(AF_PPPOX, SOCK_DGRAM, PX_PROTO_OL2TP);\n\tif (sock \u003c 0) {\n\t\tperror(\"socket\");\n\t\treturn 1;\n\t}\n\n\taddr.sa_family = AF_PPPOX;\n\taddr.sa_protocol = PX_PROTO_OL2TP;\n\taddr.pppol2tp.pid = 0;\n\taddr.pppol2tp.fd = sock;\n\taddr.pppol2tp.addr.sin_family = PF_INET;\n\taddr.pppol2tp.addr.sin_port = htons(0);\n\taddr.pppol2tp.addr.sin_addr.s_addr = inet_addr(\"192.168.0.1\");\n\taddr.pppol2tp.s_tunnel = 1;\n\taddr.pppol2tp.s_session = 0;\n\taddr.pppol2tp.d_tunnel = 0;\n\taddr.pppol2tp.d_session = 0;\n\n\tif (connect(sock, (const struct sockaddr *)\u0026addr, sizeof(addr)) \u003c 0) {\n\t\tperror(\"connect\");\n\t\treturn 1;\n\t}\n\n\treturn 0;\n}\n\nThis program causes the following lockdep warning:\n\n ============================================\n WARNING: possible recursive locking detected\n 6.2.0-rc5-00205-gc96618275234 #56 Not tainted\n --------------------------------------------\n repro/8607 is trying to acquire lock:\n ffff8880213c8130 (sk_lock-AF_PPPOX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: l2tp_tunnel_register+0x2b7/0x11c0\n\n but task is already holding lock:\n ffff8880213c8130 (sk_lock-AF_PPPOX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: pppol2tp_connect+0xa82/0x1a30\n\n other info that might help us debug this:\n  Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n        CPU0\n        ----\n   lock(sk_lock-AF_PPPOX);\n   lock(sk_lock-AF_PPPOX);\n\n  *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n  May be due to missing lock nesting notation\n\n 1 lock held by repro/8607:\n  #0: ffff8880213c8130 (sk_lock-AF_PPPOX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: pppol2tp_connect+0xa82/0x1a30\n\n stack backtrace:\n CPU: 0 PID: 8607 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.2.0-rc5-00205-gc96618275234 #56\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.1-2.fc37 04/01/2014\n Call Trace:\n  \u003cTASK\u003e\n  dump_stack_lvl+0x100/0x178\n  __lock_acquire.cold+0x119/0x3b9\n  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x410/0x410\n  lock_acquire+0x1e0/0x610\n  ? l2tp_tunnel_register+0x2b7/0x11c0\n  ? lock_downgrade+0x710/0x710\n  ? __fget_files+0x283/0x3e0\n  lock_sock_nested+0x3a/0xf0\n  ? l2tp_tunnel_register+0x2b7/0x11c0\n  l2tp_tunnel_register+0x2b7/0x11c0\n  ? sprintf+0xc4/0x100\n  ? l2tp_tunnel_del_work+0x6b0/0x6b0\n  ? debug_object_deactivate+0x320/0x320\n  ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x16d/0x7a0\n  ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x16d/0x7a0\n  ? l2tp_tunnel_create+0x2bf/0x4b0\n  ? l2tp_tunnel_create+0x3c6/0x4b0\n  pppol2tp_connect+0x14e1/0x1a30\n  ? pppol2tp_put_sk+0xd0/0xd0\n  ? aa_sk_perm+0x2b7/0xa80\n  ? aa_af_perm+0x260/0x260\n  ? bpf_lsm_socket_connect+0x9/0x10\n  ? pppol2tp_put_sk+0xd0/0xd0\n  __sys_connect_file+0x14f/0x190\n  __sys_connect+0x133/0x160\n  ? __sys_connect_file+0x190/0x190\n  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100\n  ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0x1b7/0x200\n  ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0x147/0x200\n  ? __audit_syscall_entry+0x396/0x500\n  __x64_sys_connect+0x72/0xb0\n  do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0\n  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd\n\nThis patch fixes the issue by getting/creating the tunnel before\nlocking the pppol2tp socket."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2023-53809",
  "lastModified": "2025-12-09T18:37:13.640",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2025-12-09T01:16:52.940",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4a413d360959962995e16a899cf2b9ef53e9fcb9"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4bb736b40475528ac1aa8c98b368563618488a70"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5370647dd745bb3d8f37057006be207ddd8e9314"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9ca5e7ecab064f1f47da07f7c1ddf40e4bc0e5ac"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6df58aa15f7d469f69b1dd21b001ff483255244"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…