FKIE_CVE-2023-54165

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-12-30 13:16 - Updated: 2025-12-31 20:43
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: zsmalloc: move LRU update from zs_map_object() to zs_malloc() Under memory pressure, we sometimes observe the following crash: [ 5694.832838] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5694.842093] list_del corruption, ffff888014b6a448->next is LIST_POISON1 (dead000000000100) [ 5694.858677] WARNING: CPU: 33 PID: 418824 at lib/list_debug.c:47 __list_del_entry_valid+0x42/0x80 [ 5694.961820] CPU: 33 PID: 418824 Comm: fuse_counters.s Kdump: loaded Tainted: G S 5.19.0-0_fbk3_rc3_hoangnhatpzsdynshrv41_10870_g85a9558a25de #1 [ 5694.990194] Hardware name: Wiwynn Twin Lakes MP/Twin Lakes Passive MP, BIOS YMM16 05/24/2021 [ 5695.007072] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid+0x42/0x80 [ 5695.017351] Code: 08 48 83 c2 22 48 39 d0 74 24 48 8b 10 48 39 f2 75 2c 48 8b 51 08 b0 01 48 39 f2 75 34 c3 48 c7 c7 55 d7 78 82 e8 4e 45 3b 00 <0f> 0b eb 31 48 c7 c7 27 a8 70 82 e8 3e 45 3b 00 0f 0b eb 21 48 c7 [ 5695.054919] RSP: 0018:ffffc90027aef4f0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 5695.065366] RAX: 41fe484987275300 RBX: ffff888008988180 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 5695.079636] RDX: ffff88886006c280 RSI: ffff888860060480 RDI: ffff888860060480 [ 5695.093904] RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffc90027aef370 [ 5695.108175] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffffff82fdf1c0 R12: 0000000010000002 [ 5695.122447] R13: ffff888014b6a448 R14: ffff888014b6a420 R15: 00000000138dc240 [ 5695.136717] FS: 00007f23a7d3f740(0000) GS:ffff888860040000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 5695.152899] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 5695.164388] CR2: 0000560ceaab6ac0 CR3: 000000001c06c001 CR4: 00000000007706e0 [ 5695.178659] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 5695.192927] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 5695.207197] PKRU: 55555554 [ 5695.212602] Call Trace: [ 5695.217486] <TASK> [ 5695.221674] zs_map_object+0x91/0x270 [ 5695.229000] zswap_frontswap_store+0x33d/0x870 [ 5695.237885] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x5d/0xa0 [ 5695.245899] __frontswap_store+0x51/0xb0 [ 5695.253742] swap_writepage+0x3c/0x60 [ 5695.261063] shrink_page_list+0x738/0x1230 [ 5695.269255] shrink_lruvec+0x5ec/0xcd0 [ 5695.276749] ? shrink_slab+0x187/0x5f0 [ 5695.284240] ? mem_cgroup_iter+0x6e/0x120 [ 5695.292255] shrink_node+0x293/0x7b0 [ 5695.299402] do_try_to_free_pages+0xea/0x550 [ 5695.307940] try_to_free_pages+0x19a/0x490 [ 5695.316126] __folio_alloc+0x19ff/0x3e40 [ 5695.323971] ? __filemap_get_folio+0x8a/0x4e0 [ 5695.332681] ? walk_component+0x2a8/0xb50 [ 5695.340697] ? generic_permission+0xda/0x2a0 [ 5695.349231] ? __filemap_get_folio+0x8a/0x4e0 [ 5695.357940] ? walk_component+0x2a8/0xb50 [ 5695.365955] vma_alloc_folio+0x10e/0x570 [ 5695.373796] ? walk_component+0x52/0xb50 [ 5695.381634] wp_page_copy+0x38c/0xc10 [ 5695.388953] ? filename_lookup+0x378/0xbc0 [ 5695.397140] handle_mm_fault+0x87f/0x1800 [ 5695.405157] do_user_addr_fault+0x1bd/0x570 [ 5695.413520] exc_page_fault+0x5d/0x110 [ 5695.421017] asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 After some investigation, I have found the following issue: unlike other zswap backends, zsmalloc performs the LRU list update at the object mapping time, rather than when the slot for the object is allocated. This deviation was discussed and agreed upon during the review process of the zsmalloc writeback patch series: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y3flcAXNxxrvy3ZH@cmpxchg.org/ Unfortunately, this introduces a subtle bug that occurs when there is a concurrent store and reclaim, which interleave as follows: zswap_frontswap_store() shrink_worker() zs_malloc() zs_zpool_shrink() spin_lock(&pool->lock) zs_reclaim_page() zspage = find_get_zspage() spin_unlock(&pool->lock) spin_lock(&pool->lock) zspage = list_first_entry(&pool->lru) ---truncated---
References
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d461aac924b937bcb4fd0ca1242b3ef6868ecddd
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e95adf7486f2cb5f1bb303113ca30460951923e9
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nzsmalloc: move LRU update from zs_map_object() to zs_malloc()\n\nUnder memory pressure, we sometimes observe the following crash:\n\n[ 5694.832838] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[ 5694.842093] list_del corruption, ffff888014b6a448-\u003enext is LIST_POISON1 (dead000000000100)\n[ 5694.858677] WARNING: CPU: 33 PID: 418824 at lib/list_debug.c:47 __list_del_entry_valid+0x42/0x80\n[ 5694.961820] CPU: 33 PID: 418824 Comm: fuse_counters.s Kdump: loaded Tainted: G S                5.19.0-0_fbk3_rc3_hoangnhatpzsdynshrv41_10870_g85a9558a25de #1\n[ 5694.990194] Hardware name: Wiwynn Twin Lakes MP/Twin Lakes Passive MP, BIOS YMM16 05/24/2021\n[ 5695.007072] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid+0x42/0x80\n[ 5695.017351] Code: 08 48 83 c2 22 48 39 d0 74 24 48 8b 10 48 39 f2 75 2c 48 8b 51 08 b0 01 48 39 f2 75 34 c3 48 c7 c7 55 d7 78 82 e8 4e 45 3b 00 \u003c0f\u003e 0b eb 31 48 c7 c7 27 a8 70 82 e8 3e 45 3b 00 0f 0b eb 21 48 c7\n[ 5695.054919] RSP: 0018:ffffc90027aef4f0 EFLAGS: 00010246\n[ 5695.065366] RAX: 41fe484987275300 RBX: ffff888008988180 RCX: 0000000000000000\n[ 5695.079636] RDX: ffff88886006c280 RSI: ffff888860060480 RDI: ffff888860060480\n[ 5695.093904] RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffc90027aef370\n[ 5695.108175] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffffff82fdf1c0 R12: 0000000010000002\n[ 5695.122447] R13: ffff888014b6a448 R14: ffff888014b6a420 R15: 00000000138dc240\n[ 5695.136717] FS:  00007f23a7d3f740(0000) GS:ffff888860040000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[ 5695.152899] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ 5695.164388] CR2: 0000560ceaab6ac0 CR3: 000000001c06c001 CR4: 00000000007706e0\n[ 5695.178659] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\n[ 5695.192927] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\n[ 5695.207197] PKRU: 55555554\n[ 5695.212602] Call Trace:\n[ 5695.217486]  \u003cTASK\u003e\n[ 5695.221674]  zs_map_object+0x91/0x270\n[ 5695.229000]  zswap_frontswap_store+0x33d/0x870\n[ 5695.237885]  ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x5d/0xa0\n[ 5695.245899]  __frontswap_store+0x51/0xb0\n[ 5695.253742]  swap_writepage+0x3c/0x60\n[ 5695.261063]  shrink_page_list+0x738/0x1230\n[ 5695.269255]  shrink_lruvec+0x5ec/0xcd0\n[ 5695.276749]  ? shrink_slab+0x187/0x5f0\n[ 5695.284240]  ? mem_cgroup_iter+0x6e/0x120\n[ 5695.292255]  shrink_node+0x293/0x7b0\n[ 5695.299402]  do_try_to_free_pages+0xea/0x550\n[ 5695.307940]  try_to_free_pages+0x19a/0x490\n[ 5695.316126]  __folio_alloc+0x19ff/0x3e40\n[ 5695.323971]  ? __filemap_get_folio+0x8a/0x4e0\n[ 5695.332681]  ? walk_component+0x2a8/0xb50\n[ 5695.340697]  ? generic_permission+0xda/0x2a0\n[ 5695.349231]  ? __filemap_get_folio+0x8a/0x4e0\n[ 5695.357940]  ? walk_component+0x2a8/0xb50\n[ 5695.365955]  vma_alloc_folio+0x10e/0x570\n[ 5695.373796]  ? walk_component+0x52/0xb50\n[ 5695.381634]  wp_page_copy+0x38c/0xc10\n[ 5695.388953]  ? filename_lookup+0x378/0xbc0\n[ 5695.397140]  handle_mm_fault+0x87f/0x1800\n[ 5695.405157]  do_user_addr_fault+0x1bd/0x570\n[ 5695.413520]  exc_page_fault+0x5d/0x110\n[ 5695.421017]  asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30\n\nAfter some investigation, I have found the following issue: unlike other\nzswap backends, zsmalloc performs the LRU list update at the object\nmapping time, rather than when the slot for the object is allocated.\nThis deviation was discussed and agreed upon during the review process\nof the zsmalloc writeback patch series:\n\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y3flcAXNxxrvy3ZH@cmpxchg.org/\n\nUnfortunately, this introduces a subtle bug that occurs when there is a\nconcurrent store and reclaim, which interleave as follows:\n\nzswap_frontswap_store()            shrink_worker()\n  zs_malloc()                        zs_zpool_shrink()\n    spin_lock(\u0026pool-\u003elock)             zs_reclaim_page()\n    zspage = find_get_zspage()\n    spin_unlock(\u0026pool-\u003elock)\n                                         spin_lock(\u0026pool-\u003elock)\n                                         zspage = list_first_entry(\u0026pool-\u003elru)\n                  \n---truncated---"
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2023-54165",
  "lastModified": "2025-12-31T20:43:05.160",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2025-12-30T13:16:04.283",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d461aac924b937bcb4fd0ca1242b3ef6868ecddd"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e95adf7486f2cb5f1bb303113ca30460951923e9"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.