fkie_cve-2024-10270
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-11-25 08:15
Modified
2024-11-25 08:15
Severity ?
6.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
A vulnerability was found in the Keycloak-services package. If untrusted data is passed to the SearchQueryUtils method, it could lead to a denial of service (DoS) scenario by exhausting system resources due to a Regex complexity.
References
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:10175
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:10176
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:10177
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:10178
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-10270
secalert@redhat.comhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2321214
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version


To clipboard 

{
   cveTags: [],
   descriptions: [
      {
         lang: "en",
         value: "A vulnerability was found in the Keycloak-services package. If untrusted data is passed to the SearchQueryUtils method, it could lead to a denial of service (DoS) scenario by exhausting system resources due to a Regex complexity.",
      },
      {
         lang: "es",
         value: "Se encontró una vulnerabilidad en el paquete Keycloak-services. Si se pasan datos no confiables al método SearchQueryUtils, podría generarse un escenario de denegación de servicio (DoS) al agotar los recursos del sistema debido a una complejidad de Regex.",
      },
   ],
   id: "CVE-2024-10270",
   lastModified: "2024-11-25T08:15:03.747",
   metrics: {
      cvssMetricV31: [
         {
            cvssData: {
               attackComplexity: "LOW",
               attackVector: "NETWORK",
               availabilityImpact: "HIGH",
               baseScore: 6.5,
               baseSeverity: "MEDIUM",
               confidentialityImpact: "NONE",
               integrityImpact: "NONE",
               privilegesRequired: "LOW",
               scope: "UNCHANGED",
               userInteraction: "NONE",
               vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
               version: "3.1",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 2.8,
            impactScore: 3.6,
            source: "secalert@redhat.com",
            type: "Secondary",
         },
      ],
   },
   published: "2024-11-25T08:15:03.747",
   references: [
      {
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:10175",
      },
      {
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:10176",
      },
      {
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:10177",
      },
      {
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:10178",
      },
      {
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-10270",
      },
      {
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2321214",
      },
   ],
   sourceIdentifier: "secalert@redhat.com",
   vulnStatus: "Awaiting Analysis",
   weaknesses: [
      {
         description: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "CWE-1333",
            },
         ],
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         type: "Secondary",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.