FKIE_CVE-2024-12115

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-12-07 02:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 06:59
Severity
4.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Summary
The Poll Maker – Versus Polls, Anonymous Polls, Image Polls plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.5.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the duplicate_poll() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to duplicate polls via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
References
security@wordfence.comhttps://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3202972/poll-maker/tags/5.5.5/includes/lists/class-poll-maker-polls-list-table.php?old=3202972&old_path=poll-maker%2Ftags%2F5.5.4%2Fincludes%2Flists%2Fclass-poll-maker-polls-list-table.phpPatch
security@wordfence.comhttps://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/e76447ec-2815-4758-ae2c-67a938a739d9?source=cveThird Party Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
ays-pro poll_maker *
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Poll Maker \u2013 Versus Polls, Anonymous Polls, Image Polls",
          "vendor": "ays-pro",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "5.5.4",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:ays-pro:poll_maker:*:*:*:*:free:wordpress:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "19A61F63-5617-455C-AA20-0CA79E7DA222",
              "versionEndExcluding": "5.5.5",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The Poll Maker \u2013 Versus Polls, Anonymous Polls, Image Polls plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.5.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the duplicate_poll() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to duplicate polls via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El complemento Poll Maker \u2013 Versus Polls, Anonymous Polls, Image Polls para WordPress es vulnerable a la Cross Site Request Forgery en todas las versiones hasta la 5.5.4 incluida. Esto se debe a la falta o la validaci\u00f3n incorrecta de nonce en la funci\u00f3n duplicate_poll(). Esto hace posible que atacantes no autenticados dupliquen las encuestas a trav\u00e9s de una solicitud falsificada, siempre que puedan enga\u00f1ar a un administrador del sitio para que realice una acci\u00f3n como hacer clic en un enlace."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-12115",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T06:59:04.650",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 4.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2024-12115",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2024-12-09T17:37:14.099380Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2024-12-07T02:15:18.653",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3202972/poll-maker/tags/5.5.5/includes/lists/class-poll-maker-polls-list-table.php?old=3202972\u0026old_path=poll-maker%2Ftags%2F5.5.4%2Fincludes%2Flists%2Fclass-poll-maker-polls-list-table.php"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/e76447ec-2815-4758-ae2c-67a938a739d9?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-352"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.