FKIE_CVE-2024-13057

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-01-27 06:15 - Updated: 2025-05-07 19:06
Severity ?
7.1 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Summary
The Dyn Business Panel WordPress plugin through 1.0.0 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack.
References
contact@wpscan.comhttps://wpscan.com/vulnerability/6f869a3d-1ac1-4d31-8fe5-9b9795b15b5b/Exploit, Third Party Advisory
134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/6f869a3d-1ac1-4d31-8fe5-9b9795b15b5b/Exploit, Third Party Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
phycticio dyn_business_panel 1.0.0
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:phycticio:dyn_business_panel:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "5675D802-4B8A-4CDF-8714-FE83B18212B2",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The Dyn Business Panel WordPress plugin through 1.0.0 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El complemento Dyn Business Panel para WordPress hasta la versi\u00f3n 1.0.0 no tiene verificaci\u00f3n CSRF en algunos lugares y le falta desinfecci\u00f3n y escape, lo que podr\u00eda permitir a los atacantes hacer que el administrador que haya iniciado sesi\u00f3n agregue XSS almacenado payloads a trav\u00e9s de un ataque CSRF."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-13057",
  "lastModified": "2025-05-07T19:06:50.503",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 7.1,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 3.7,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-01-27T06:15:23.243",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "contact@wpscan.com",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/6f869a3d-1ac1-4d31-8fe5-9b9795b15b5b/"
    },
    {
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/6f869a3d-1ac1-4d31-8fe5-9b9795b15b5b/"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "contact@wpscan.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-352"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.