FKIE_CVE-2024-26962

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-05-01 06:15 - Updated: 2024-12-23 13:39
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dm-raid456, md/raid456: fix a deadlock for dm-raid456 while io concurrent with reshape For raid456, if reshape is still in progress, then IO across reshape position will wait for reshape to make progress. However, for dm-raid, in following cases reshape will never make progress hence IO will hang: 1) the array is read-only; 2) MD_RECOVERY_WAIT is set; 3) MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN is set; After commit c467e97f079f ("md/raid6: use valid sector values to determine if an I/O should wait on the reshape") fix the problem that IO across reshape position doesn't wait for reshape, the dm-raid test shell/lvconvert-raid-reshape.sh start to hang: [root@fedora ~]# cat /proc/979/stack [<0>] wait_woken+0x7d/0x90 [<0>] raid5_make_request+0x929/0x1d70 [raid456] [<0>] md_handle_request+0xc2/0x3b0 [md_mod] [<0>] raid_map+0x2c/0x50 [dm_raid] [<0>] __map_bio+0x251/0x380 [dm_mod] [<0>] dm_submit_bio+0x1f0/0x760 [dm_mod] [<0>] __submit_bio+0xc2/0x1c0 [<0>] submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x17f/0x450 [<0>] submit_bio_noacct+0x2bc/0x780 [<0>] submit_bio+0x70/0xc0 [<0>] mpage_readahead+0x169/0x1f0 [<0>] blkdev_readahead+0x18/0x30 [<0>] read_pages+0x7c/0x3b0 [<0>] page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x1ab/0x280 [<0>] force_page_cache_ra+0x9e/0x130 [<0>] page_cache_sync_ra+0x3b/0x110 [<0>] filemap_get_pages+0x143/0xa30 [<0>] filemap_read+0xdc/0x4b0 [<0>] blkdev_read_iter+0x75/0x200 [<0>] vfs_read+0x272/0x460 [<0>] ksys_read+0x7a/0x170 [<0>] __x64_sys_read+0x1c/0x30 [<0>] do_syscall_64+0xc6/0x230 [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6c/0x74 This is because reshape can't make progress. For md/raid, the problem doesn't exist because register new sync_thread doesn't rely on the IO to be done any more: 1) If array is read-only, it can switch to read-write by ioctl/sysfs; 2) md/raid never set MD_RECOVERY_WAIT; 3) If MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN is set, mddev_suspend() doesn't hold 'reconfig_mutex', hence it can be cleared and reshape can continue by sysfs api 'sync_action'. However, I'm not sure yet how to avoid the problem in dm-raid yet. This patch on the one hand make sure raid_message() can't change sync_thread() through raid_message() after presuspend(), on the other hand detect the above 3 cases before wait for IO do be done in dm_suspend(), and let dm-raid requeue those IO.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
linux linux_kernel *
linux linux_kernel *

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "D395D167-B806-45A5-9C34-38C8A1FE0F7B",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.7.12",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "4C59BBC3-6495-4A77-9C82-55EC7CDF5E02",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.8.3",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.8",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndm-raid456, md/raid456: fix a deadlock for dm-raid456 while io concurrent with reshape\n\nFor raid456, if reshape is still in progress, then IO across reshape\nposition will wait for reshape to make progress. However, for dm-raid,\nin following cases reshape will never make progress hence IO will hang:\n\n1) the array is read-only;\n2) MD_RECOVERY_WAIT is set;\n3) MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN is set;\n\nAfter commit c467e97f079f (\"md/raid6: use valid sector values to determine\nif an I/O should wait on the reshape\") fix the problem that IO across\nreshape position doesn\u0027t wait for reshape, the dm-raid test\nshell/lvconvert-raid-reshape.sh start to hang:\n\n[root@fedora ~]# cat /proc/979/stack\n[\u003c0\u003e] wait_woken+0x7d/0x90\n[\u003c0\u003e] raid5_make_request+0x929/0x1d70 [raid456]\n[\u003c0\u003e] md_handle_request+0xc2/0x3b0 [md_mod]\n[\u003c0\u003e] raid_map+0x2c/0x50 [dm_raid]\n[\u003c0\u003e] __map_bio+0x251/0x380 [dm_mod]\n[\u003c0\u003e] dm_submit_bio+0x1f0/0x760 [dm_mod]\n[\u003c0\u003e] __submit_bio+0xc2/0x1c0\n[\u003c0\u003e] submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x17f/0x450\n[\u003c0\u003e] submit_bio_noacct+0x2bc/0x780\n[\u003c0\u003e] submit_bio+0x70/0xc0\n[\u003c0\u003e] mpage_readahead+0x169/0x1f0\n[\u003c0\u003e] blkdev_readahead+0x18/0x30\n[\u003c0\u003e] read_pages+0x7c/0x3b0\n[\u003c0\u003e] page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x1ab/0x280\n[\u003c0\u003e] force_page_cache_ra+0x9e/0x130\n[\u003c0\u003e] page_cache_sync_ra+0x3b/0x110\n[\u003c0\u003e] filemap_get_pages+0x143/0xa30\n[\u003c0\u003e] filemap_read+0xdc/0x4b0\n[\u003c0\u003e] blkdev_read_iter+0x75/0x200\n[\u003c0\u003e] vfs_read+0x272/0x460\n[\u003c0\u003e] ksys_read+0x7a/0x170\n[\u003c0\u003e] __x64_sys_read+0x1c/0x30\n[\u003c0\u003e] do_syscall_64+0xc6/0x230\n[\u003c0\u003e] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6c/0x74\n\nThis is because reshape can\u0027t make progress.\n\nFor md/raid, the problem doesn\u0027t exist because register new sync_thread\ndoesn\u0027t rely on the IO to be done any more:\n\n1) If array is read-only, it can switch to read-write by ioctl/sysfs;\n2) md/raid never set MD_RECOVERY_WAIT;\n3) If MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN is set, mddev_suspend() doesn\u0027t hold\n   \u0027reconfig_mutex\u0027, hence it can be cleared and reshape can continue by\n   sysfs api \u0027sync_action\u0027.\n\nHowever, I\u0027m not sure yet how to avoid the problem in dm-raid yet. This\npatch on the one hand make sure raid_message() can\u0027t change\nsync_thread() through raid_message() after presuspend(), on the other\nhand detect the above 3 cases before wait for IO do be done in\ndm_suspend(), and let dm-raid requeue those IO."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se resolvi\u00f3 la siguiente vulnerabilidad: dm-raid456, md/raid456: soluciona un punto muerto para dm-raid456 mientras io concurre con reshape. Para raid456, si el reshape todav\u00eda est\u00e1 en progreso, entonces IO en la posici\u00f3n de reshape esperar\u00e1 remodelar para progresar. Sin embargo, para dm-raid, en los siguientes casos la remodelaci\u00f3n nunca progresar\u00e1, por lo que IO se bloquear\u00e1: 1) la matriz es de solo lectura; 2) MD_RECOVERY_WAIT est\u00e1 configurado; 3) MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN est\u00e1 configurado; Despu\u00e9s de confirmar c467e97f079f (\"md/raid6: use valores de sector v\u00e1lidos para determinar si una E/S debe esperar a la remodelaci\u00f3n\") solucione el problema de que IO en la posici\u00f3n de remodelaci\u00f3n no espera a la remodelaci\u00f3n, la prueba dm-raid shell/lvconvert -raid-reshape.sh comienza a colgarse: [root@fedora ~]# cat /proc/979/stack [\u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] wait_woken+0x7d/0x90 [\u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] raid5_make_request+0x929/0x1d70 [raid456] [\u0026lt;0 \u0026gt;] md_handle_request+0xc2/0x3b0 [md_mod] [\u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] raid_map+0x2c/0x50 [dm_raid] [\u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] __map_bio+0x251/0x380 [dm_mod] [\u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] dm_submit_bio+0x1f0/0x760 [dm_mod] [ \u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] __submit_bio+0xc2/0x1c0 [\u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x17f/0x450 [\u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] submit_bio_noacct+0x2bc/0x780 [\u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] submit_bio+0x70/0xc0 [\u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] mpage_readahead+0x169/0x1f0 [ \u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] blkdev_readahead+0x18/0x30 [\u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] read_pages+0x7c/0x3b0 [\u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x1ab/0x280 [\u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] force_page_cache_ra+0x9e/0x130 [\u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] page_cache_sync_ra+0x3b/0x110 [ \u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] filemap_get_pages+0x143/0xa30 [\u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] filemap_read+0xdc/0x4b0 [\u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] blkdev_read_iter+0x75/0x200 [\u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] vfs_read+0x272/0x460 [\u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] ksys_read+0x7a/0x170 [ \u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] __x64_sys_read+0x1c/0x30 [\u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] do_syscall_64+0xc6/0x230 [\u0026lt;0\u0026gt;] Entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6c/0x74 Esto se debe a que la remodelaci\u00f3n no puede progresar. Para md/raid, el problema no existe porque registrar un nuevo sync_thread ya no depende de que se realice la IO: 1) Si la matriz es de solo lectura, puede cambiar a lectura-escritura mediante ioctl/sysfs; 2) md/raid nunca configur\u00f3 MD_RECOVERY_WAIT; 3) Si se configura MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, mddev_suspend() no contiene \u0027reconfig_mutex\u0027, por lo tanto, se puede borrar y la remodelaci\u00f3n puede continuar mediante sysfs api \u0027sync_action\u0027. Sin embargo, todav\u00eda no estoy seguro de c\u00f3mo evitar el problema en dm-raid. Este parche, por un lado, garantiza que raid_message() no pueda cambiar sync_thread() a trav\u00e9s de raid_message() despu\u00e9s de presuspend(), por otro lado detecta los 3 casos anteriores antes de esperar a que IO se realice en dm_suspend(), y deja dm-raid pone en cola esas IO."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-26962",
  "lastModified": "2024-12-23T13:39:33.543",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 5.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2024-05-01T06:15:12.527",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/41425f96d7aa59bc865f60f5dda3d7697b555677"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5943a34bf6bab5801e08a55f63e1b8d5bc90dae1"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a8d249d770cb357d16a2097b548d2e4c1c137304"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/41425f96d7aa59bc865f60f5dda3d7697b555677"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5943a34bf6bab5801e08a55f63e1b8d5bc90dae1"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a8d249d770cb357d16a2097b548d2e4c1c137304"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-667"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…