FKIE_CVE-2024-34478
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-05-05 01:15 - Updated: 2025-08-21 15:42
Severity ?
Summary
btcd before 0.24.0 does not correctly implement the consensus rules outlined in BIP 68 and BIP 112, making it susceptible to consensus failures. Specifically, it uses the transaction version as a signed integer when it is supposed to be treated as unsigned. There can be a chain split and loss of funds.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| btcd_project | btcd | * |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:btcd_project:btcd:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B1A28966-956A-4EF6-B2B3-FF6B74BB2B97",
"versionEndExcluding": "0.24.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "btcd before 0.24.0 does not correctly implement the consensus rules outlined in BIP 68 and BIP 112, making it susceptible to consensus failures. Specifically, it uses the transaction version as a signed integer when it is supposed to be treated as unsigned. There can be a chain split and loss of funds."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "btcd anterior a 0.24.0 no implementa correctamente las reglas de consenso descritas en BIP 68 y BIP 112, lo que lo hace susceptible a fallas de consenso. Espec\u00edficamente, utiliza la versi\u00f3n de la transacci\u00f3n como un entero con signo cuando se supone que debe tratarse como sin signo. Puede haber una divisi\u00f3n de la cadena y una p\u00e9rdida de fondos."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-34478",
"lastModified": "2025-08-21T15:42:23.163",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2024-05-05T01:15:06.320",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking"
],
"url": "https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/disclosure-btcd-consensus-bugs-due-to-usage-of-signed-transaction-version/455"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/btcsuite/btcd/blob/e4c88c3a3ecb1813529bf3dddc7a865bd418a6b8/blockchain/chain.go#L383C1-L392C3"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/btcsuite/btcd/blob/e4c88c3a3ecb1813529bf3dddc7a865bd418a6b8/txscript/opcode.go#L1172C1-L1178C3"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking"
],
"url": "https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/disclosure-btcd-consensus-bugs-due-to-usage-of-signed-transaction-version/455"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/btcsuite/btcd/blob/e4c88c3a3ecb1813529bf3dddc7a865bd418a6b8/blockchain/chain.go#L383C1-L392C3"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/btcsuite/btcd/blob/e4c88c3a3ecb1813529bf3dddc7a865bd418a6b8/txscript/opcode.go#L1172C1-L1178C3"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-436"
}
],
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…