FKIE_CVE-2024-3472

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-05-02 06:15 - Updated: 2025-05-08 18:45
Severity ?
5.9 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Summary
The Modal Window WordPress plugin before 5.3.10 does not have CSRF check in place when bulk deleting modals, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete them via a CSRF attack
References
contact@wpscan.comhttps://wpscan.com/vulnerability/d42f74dd-520f-40aa-9cf0-3544db9562c7/Exploit, Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/d42f74dd-520f-40aa-9cf0-3544db9562c7/Exploit, Third Party Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
wow-company modal_window *
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:wow-company:modal_window:*:*:*:*:*:wordpress:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "8D17474B-2A41-4B7E-955E-4489DB9181F7",
              "versionEndExcluding": "5.3.10",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The Modal Window  WordPress plugin before 5.3.10 does not have CSRF check in place when bulk deleting modals, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete them via a CSRF attack"
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El complemento Modal Window de WordPress anterior a 5.3.10 no tiene activada la verificaci\u00f3n CSRF cuando se eliminan modales de forma masiva, lo que podr\u00eda permitir a los atacantes hacer que un administrador que haya iniciado sesi\u00f3n los elimine mediante un ataque CSRF."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-3472",
  "lastModified": "2025-05-08T18:45:31.527",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 5.9,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.5,
        "impactScore": 3.4,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2024-05-02T06:15:50.453",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "contact@wpscan.com",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/d42f74dd-520f-40aa-9cf0-3544db9562c7/"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/d42f74dd-520f-40aa-9cf0-3544db9562c7/"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "contact@wpscan.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-352"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.