fkie_cve-2024-36925
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-05-30 16:15
Modified
2024-11-21 09:22
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: swiotlb: initialise restricted pool list_head when SWIOTLB_DYNAMIC=y Using restricted DMA pools (CONFIG_DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL=y) in conjunction with dynamic SWIOTLB (CONFIG_SWIOTLB_DYNAMIC=y) leads to the following crash when initialising the restricted pools at boot-time: | Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000008 | Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP | pc : rmem_swiotlb_device_init+0xfc/0x1ec | lr : rmem_swiotlb_device_init+0xf0/0x1ec | Call trace: | rmem_swiotlb_device_init+0xfc/0x1ec | of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx+0x18c/0x238 | of_dma_configure_id+0x31c/0x33c | platform_dma_configure+0x34/0x80 faddr2line reveals that the crash is in the list validation code: include/linux/list.h:83 include/linux/rculist.h:79 include/linux/rculist.h:106 kernel/dma/swiotlb.c:306 kernel/dma/swiotlb.c:1695 because add_mem_pool() is trying to list_add_rcu() to a NULL 'mem->pools'. Fix the crash by initialising the 'mem->pools' list_head in rmem_swiotlb_device_init() before calling add_mem_pool().
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
linux linux_kernel *
linux linux_kernel *



{
   configurations: [
      {
         nodes: [
            {
               cpeMatch: [
                  {
                     criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                     matchCriteriaId: "E7C57DED-21B6-460F-B4F1-8916B9B7A32E",
                     versionEndExcluding: "6.6.31",
                     versionStartIncluding: "6.6",
                     vulnerable: true,
                  },
                  {
                     criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                     matchCriteriaId: "6A6B920C-8D8F-4130-86B4-AD334F4CF2E3",
                     versionEndExcluding: "6.8.10",
                     versionStartIncluding: "6.7",
                     vulnerable: true,
                  },
               ],
               negate: false,
               operator: "OR",
            },
         ],
      },
   ],
   cveTags: [],
   descriptions: [
      {
         lang: "en",
         value: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nswiotlb: initialise restricted pool list_head when SWIOTLB_DYNAMIC=y\n\nUsing restricted DMA pools (CONFIG_DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL=y) in conjunction\nwith dynamic SWIOTLB (CONFIG_SWIOTLB_DYNAMIC=y) leads to the following\ncrash when initialising the restricted pools at boot-time:\n\n  | Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000008\n  | Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP\n  | pc : rmem_swiotlb_device_init+0xfc/0x1ec\n  | lr : rmem_swiotlb_device_init+0xf0/0x1ec\n  | Call trace:\n  |  rmem_swiotlb_device_init+0xfc/0x1ec\n  |  of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx+0x18c/0x238\n  |  of_dma_configure_id+0x31c/0x33c\n  |  platform_dma_configure+0x34/0x80\n\nfaddr2line reveals that the crash is in the list validation code:\n\n  include/linux/list.h:83\n  include/linux/rculist.h:79\n  include/linux/rculist.h:106\n  kernel/dma/swiotlb.c:306\n  kernel/dma/swiotlb.c:1695\n\nbecause add_mem_pool() is trying to list_add_rcu() to a NULL\n'mem->pools'.\n\nFix the crash by initialising the 'mem->pools' list_head in\nrmem_swiotlb_device_init() before calling add_mem_pool().",
      },
      {
         lang: "es",
         value: "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: swiotlb: inicializa el grupo restringido list_head cuando SWIOTLB_DYNAMIC=y El uso de grupos DMA restringidos (CONFIG_DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL=y) junto con SWIOTLB dinámico (CONFIG_SWIOTLB_DYNAMIC=y) provoca el siguiente bloqueo al inicializar el grupo restringido grupos en el momento del arranque: | No se puede manejar la desreferencia del puntero NULL del kernel en la dirección virtual 0000000000000008 | Error interno: Ups: 0000000096000005 [#1] SMP ANTICIPADO | ordenador personal: rmem_swiotlb_device_init+0xfc/0x1ec | lr: rmem_swiotlb_device_init+0xf0/0x1ec | Rastreo de llamadas: | rmem_swiotlb_device_init+0xfc/0x1ec | of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx+0x18c/0x238 | of_dma_configure_id+0x31c/0x33c | platform_dma_configure+0x34/0x80 faddr2line revela que el bloqueo está en el código de validación de la lista: include/linux/list.h:83 include/linux/rculist.h:79 include/linux/rculist.h:106 kernel/dma/swiotlb. c:306 kernel/dma/swiotlb.c:1695 porque add_mem_pool() está intentando list_add_rcu() a un NULL 'mem->pools'. Solucione el problema inicializando el list_head 'mem->pools' en rmem_swiotlb_device_init() antes de llamar a add_mem_pool().",
      },
   ],
   id: "CVE-2024-36925",
   lastModified: "2024-11-21T09:22:49.863",
   metrics: {
      cvssMetricV31: [
         {
            cvssData: {
               attackComplexity: "LOW",
               attackVector: "LOCAL",
               availabilityImpact: "HIGH",
               baseScore: 5.5,
               baseSeverity: "MEDIUM",
               confidentialityImpact: "NONE",
               integrityImpact: "NONE",
               privilegesRequired: "LOW",
               scope: "UNCHANGED",
               userInteraction: "NONE",
               vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
               version: "3.1",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 1.8,
            impactScore: 3.6,
            source: "nvd@nist.gov",
            type: "Primary",
         },
      ],
   },
   published: "2024-05-30T16:15:15.800",
   references: [
      {
         source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
         tags: [
            "Patch",
         ],
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/75961ffb5cb3e5196f19cae7683f35cc88b50800",
      },
      {
         source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
         tags: [
            "Patch",
         ],
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f2a6b3ed20f2dea4cb645abc6a73c4595662adca",
      },
      {
         source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
         tags: [
            "Patch",
         ],
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f62e0fefcdfe2c05ccb1aa80521a69524eea9c84",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         tags: [
            "Patch",
         ],
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/75961ffb5cb3e5196f19cae7683f35cc88b50800",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         tags: [
            "Patch",
         ],
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f2a6b3ed20f2dea4cb645abc6a73c4595662adca",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         tags: [
            "Patch",
         ],
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f62e0fefcdfe2c05ccb1aa80521a69524eea9c84",
      },
   ],
   sourceIdentifier: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
   vulnStatus: "Modified",
   weaknesses: [
      {
         description: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "CWE-476",
            },
         ],
         source: "nvd@nist.gov",
         type: "Primary",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.