FKIE_CVE-2024-39181

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-07-09 21:15 - Updated: 2025-08-20 15:39
Summary
Shenzhen Libituo Technology Co., Ltd LBT-T300-T400 v3.2 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the ApCliSsid parameter in thegenerate_conf_router() function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted POST request.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
szlbt lbt-t300-t400_firmware 3.2
szlbt lbt-t300-t400 -

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:szlbt:lbt-t300-t400_firmware:3.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "E39A1F49-F114-4134-AFC1-013FA7BFD95B",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        },
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:szlbt:lbt-t300-t400:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "74649958-C0A7-4699-A067-5BFED5F753E9",
              "vulnerable": false
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ],
      "operator": "AND"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Shenzhen Libituo Technology Co., Ltd LBT-T300-T400 v3.2 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the ApCliSsid parameter in thegenerate_conf_router() function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted POST request."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Se descubri\u00f3 que Shenzhen Libituo Technology Co., Ltd LBT-T300-T400 v3.2 conten\u00eda un desbordamiento del b\u00fafer a trav\u00e9s del par\u00e1metro ApCliSsid en la funci\u00f3n generar_conf_router(). Esta vulnerabilidad permite a los atacantes provocar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (DoS) mediante una solicitud POST manipulada."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-39181",
  "lastModified": "2025-08-20T15:39:10.930",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 6.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2024-07-09T21:15:15.403",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/SunsetR/Vulnerability-information/blob/main/LBT-T300-T400_ApCliSsid_Buffer%20overflow.md"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/SunsetR/Vulnerability-information/blob/main/LBT-T300-T400_ApCliSsid_Buffer%20overflow.md"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-120"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…