FKIE_CVE-2024-4082

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-05-14 15:42 - Updated: 2024-11-21 09:42
Summary
The Joli FAQ SEO – WordPress FAQ Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The Joli FAQ SEO \u2013 WordPress FAQ Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the plugin\u0027s settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El complemento Joli FAQ SEO \u2013 WordPress FAQ Plugin para WordPress es vulnerable a la Cross-Site Request Forgery en todas las versiones hasta la 1.3.2 incluida. Esto se debe a que falta una validaci\u00f3n nonce o es incorrecta al guardar la configuraci\u00f3n. Esto hace posible que atacantes no autenticados cambien la configuraci\u00f3n del complemento mediante una solicitud falsificada, siempre que puedan enga\u00f1ar al administrador del sitio para que realice una acci\u00f3n como hacer clic en un enlace."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-4082",
  "lastModified": "2024-11-21T09:42:09.593",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 4.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2024-05-14T15:42:51.360",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026new=3081648%40joli-faq-seo%2Ftrunk\u0026old=3076380%40joli-faq-seo%2Ftrunk\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/c45b6163-7ebf-4f18-afd6-735d02d9170d?source=cve"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026new=3081648%40joli-faq-seo%2Ftrunk\u0026old=3076380%40joli-faq-seo%2Ftrunk\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/c45b6163-7ebf-4f18-afd6-735d02d9170d?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…