FKIE_CVE-2024-41092

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-07-29 16:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 07:47
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/i915/gt: Fix potential UAF by revoke of fence registers CI has been sporadically reporting the following issue triggered by igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck on ADL-P and similar machines: <6> [414.049203] i915: Running intel_hangcheck_live_selftests/igt_reset_evict_fence ... <6> [414.068804] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: GUC: submission enabled <6> [414.068812] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: GUC: SLPC enabled <3> [414.070354] Unable to pin Y-tiled fence; err:-4 <3> [414.071282] i915_vma_revoke_fence:301 GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_active_is_idle(&fence->active)) ... <4>[ 609.603992] ------------[ cut here ]------------ <2>[ 609.603995] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt_fencing.c:301! <4>[ 609.604003] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI <4>[ 609.604006] CPU: 0 PID: 268 Comm: kworker/u64:3 Tainted: G U W 6.9.0-CI_DRM_14785-g1ba62f8cea9c+ #1 <4>[ 609.604008] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Alder Lake Client Platform/AlderLake-P DDR4 RVP, BIOS RPLPFWI1.R00.4035.A00.2301200723 01/20/2023 <4>[ 609.604010] Workqueue: i915 __i915_gem_free_work [i915] <4>[ 609.604149] RIP: 0010:i915_vma_revoke_fence+0x187/0x1f0 [i915] ... <4>[ 609.604271] Call Trace: <4>[ 609.604273] <TASK> ... <4>[ 609.604716] __i915_vma_evict+0x2e9/0x550 [i915] <4>[ 609.604852] __i915_vma_unbind+0x7c/0x160 [i915] <4>[ 609.604977] force_unbind+0x24/0xa0 [i915] <4>[ 609.605098] i915_vma_destroy+0x2f/0xa0 [i915] <4>[ 609.605210] __i915_gem_object_pages_fini+0x51/0x2f0 [i915] <4>[ 609.605330] __i915_gem_free_objects.isra.0+0x6a/0xc0 [i915] <4>[ 609.605440] process_scheduled_works+0x351/0x690 ... In the past, there were similar failures reported by CI from other IGT tests, observed on other platforms. Before commit 63baf4f3d587 ("drm/i915/gt: Only wait for GPU activity before unbinding a GGTT fence"), i915_vma_revoke_fence() was waiting for idleness of vma->active via fence_update(). That commit introduced vma->fence->active in order for the fence_update() to be able to wait selectively on that one instead of vma->active since only idleness of fence registers was needed. But then, another commit 0d86ee35097a ("drm/i915/gt: Make fence revocation unequivocal") replaced the call to fence_update() in i915_vma_revoke_fence() with only fence_write(), and also added that GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_active_is_idle(&fence->active)) in front. No justification was provided on why we might then expect idleness of vma->fence->active without first waiting on it. The issue can be potentially caused by a race among revocation of fence registers on one side and sequential execution of signal callbacks invoked on completion of a request that was using them on the other, still processed in parallel to revocation of those fence registers. Fix it by waiting for idleness of vma->fence->active in i915_vma_revoke_fence(). (cherry picked from commit 24bb052d3dd499c5956abad5f7d8e4fd07da7fb1)
Impacted products

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Linux",
          "programFiles": [
            "drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt_fencing.c"
          ],
          "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
          "vendor": "Linux",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "f771b91f21c46ad1217328d05e72a2c7e3add535",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0d86ee35097ae0f1c2c50f2b8035ef480e25e4f1",
              "versionType": "git"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "29c0fdf49078ab161570d3d1c6e13d66f182717d",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0d86ee35097ae0f1c2c50f2b8035ef480e25e4f1",
              "versionType": "git"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "ca0fabd365a27a94a36e68a7a02df8ff3c13dac6",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0d86ee35097ae0f1c2c50f2b8035ef480e25e4f1",
              "versionType": "git"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "06dec31a0a5112a91f49085e8a8fa1a82296d5c7",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0d86ee35097ae0f1c2c50f2b8035ef480e25e4f1",
              "versionType": "git"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "414f4a31f7a811008fd9a33b06216b060bad18fc",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0d86ee35097ae0f1c2c50f2b8035ef480e25e4f1",
              "versionType": "git"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "996c3412a06578e9d779a16b9e79ace18125ab50",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0d86ee35097ae0f1c2c50f2b8035ef480e25e4f1",
              "versionType": "git"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "Linux",
          "programFiles": [
            "drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt_fencing.c"
          ],
          "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
          "vendor": "Linux",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "5.8"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "5.8",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "5.10.221",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "5.15.162",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.1.97",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.6.37",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.9.*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.9.8",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.10",
              "versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "9C4870DD-D890-4898-91A0-A77991EB51FB",
              "versionEndExcluding": "5.10.221",
              "versionStartIncluding": "5.8",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "10A39ACC-3005-40E8-875C-98A372D1FFD5",
              "versionEndExcluding": "5.15.162",
              "versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "748B6C4B-1F61-47F9-96CC-8899B8412D84",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.1.97",
              "versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "D72E033B-5323-4C4D-8818-36E1EBC3535F",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.6.37",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "E95105F2-32E3-4C5F-9D18-7AEFD0E6275C",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.9.8",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/i915/gt: Fix potential UAF by revoke of fence registers\n\nCI has been sporadically reporting the following issue triggered by\nigt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck on ADL-P and similar machines:\n\n\u003c6\u003e [414.049203] i915: Running intel_hangcheck_live_selftests/igt_reset_evict_fence\n...\n\u003c6\u003e [414.068804] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: GUC: submission enabled\n\u003c6\u003e [414.068812] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: GUC: SLPC enabled\n\u003c3\u003e [414.070354] Unable to pin Y-tiled fence; err:-4\n\u003c3\u003e [414.071282] i915_vma_revoke_fence:301 GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_active_is_idle(\u0026fence-\u003eactive))\n...\n\u003c4\u003e[  609.603992] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n\u003c2\u003e[  609.603995] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt_fencing.c:301!\n\u003c4\u003e[  609.604003] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\n\u003c4\u003e[  609.604006] CPU: 0 PID: 268 Comm: kworker/u64:3 Tainted: G     U  W          6.9.0-CI_DRM_14785-g1ba62f8cea9c+ #1\n\u003c4\u003e[  609.604008] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Alder Lake Client Platform/AlderLake-P DDR4 RVP, BIOS RPLPFWI1.R00.4035.A00.2301200723 01/20/2023\n\u003c4\u003e[  609.604010] Workqueue: i915 __i915_gem_free_work [i915]\n\u003c4\u003e[  609.604149] RIP: 0010:i915_vma_revoke_fence+0x187/0x1f0 [i915]\n...\n\u003c4\u003e[  609.604271] Call Trace:\n\u003c4\u003e[  609.604273]  \u003cTASK\u003e\n...\n\u003c4\u003e[  609.604716]  __i915_vma_evict+0x2e9/0x550 [i915]\n\u003c4\u003e[  609.604852]  __i915_vma_unbind+0x7c/0x160 [i915]\n\u003c4\u003e[  609.604977]  force_unbind+0x24/0xa0 [i915]\n\u003c4\u003e[  609.605098]  i915_vma_destroy+0x2f/0xa0 [i915]\n\u003c4\u003e[  609.605210]  __i915_gem_object_pages_fini+0x51/0x2f0 [i915]\n\u003c4\u003e[  609.605330]  __i915_gem_free_objects.isra.0+0x6a/0xc0 [i915]\n\u003c4\u003e[  609.605440]  process_scheduled_works+0x351/0x690\n...\n\nIn the past, there were similar failures reported by CI from other IGT\ntests, observed on other platforms.\n\nBefore commit 63baf4f3d587 (\"drm/i915/gt: Only wait for GPU activity\nbefore unbinding a GGTT fence\"), i915_vma_revoke_fence() was waiting for\nidleness of vma-\u003eactive via fence_update().   That commit introduced\nvma-\u003efence-\u003eactive in order for the fence_update() to be able to wait\nselectively on that one instead of vma-\u003eactive since only idleness of\nfence registers was needed.  But then, another commit 0d86ee35097a\n(\"drm/i915/gt: Make fence revocation unequivocal\") replaced the call to\nfence_update() in i915_vma_revoke_fence() with only fence_write(), and\nalso added that GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_active_is_idle(\u0026fence-\u003eactive)) in front.\nNo justification was provided on why we might then expect idleness of\nvma-\u003efence-\u003eactive without first waiting on it.\n\nThe issue can be potentially caused by a race among revocation of fence\nregisters on one side and sequential execution of signal callbacks invoked\non completion of a request that was using them on the other, still\nprocessed in parallel to revocation of those fence registers.  Fix it by\nwaiting for idleness of vma-\u003efence-\u003eactive in i915_vma_revoke_fence().\n\n(cherry picked from commit 24bb052d3dd499c5956abad5f7d8e4fd07da7fb1)"
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: drm/i915/gt: corrige un posible UAF mediante la revocaci\u00f3n de los registros de valla. CI ha estado informando espor\u00e1dicamente el siguiente problema provocado por igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck en ADL-P y m\u00e1quinas similares. : \u0026lt;6\u0026gt; [414.049203] I915: ejecutando Intel_hangcheck_live_SelfTests/IGT_RESET_EVICT_FENCE ... \u0026lt;6\u0026gt; [414.068804] I915 0000: 00: 02.0: [DRM] GT0: GUC: CUBLICIDAD : [drm] GT0: GUC: SLPC habilitado \u0026lt;3\u0026gt; [414.070354] No se puede fijar la cerca con mosaicos en Y; err:-4 \u0026lt;3\u0026gt; [414.071282] i915_vma_revoke_fence:301 GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_active_is_idle(\u0026amp;fence-\u0026gt;active)) ... \u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.603992] ------------[ cortar aqu\u00ed ]- ----------- \u0026lt;2\u0026gt;[ 609.603995] \u00a1ERROR del kernel en drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt_fencing.c:301! \u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.604003] c\u00f3digo de operaci\u00f3n no v\u00e1lido: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI \u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.604006] CPU: 0 PID: 268 Comm: kworker/u64:3 Contaminado: GUW 6.9.0-CI_DRM_14785-g1ba62f8cea9c+ #1 \u0026lt;4 \u0026gt;[ 609.604008] Nombre del hardware: Intel Corporation Alder Lake Client Platform/AlderLake-P DDR4 RVP, BIOS RPLPFWI1.R00.4035.A00.2301200723 20/01/2023 \u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.604010] Cola de trabajo: i915 __i915_gem_free_work [i915] \u0026lt;4 \u0026gt;[ 609.604149] RIP: 0010:i915_vma_revoke_fence+0x187/0x1f0 [i915] ... \u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.604271] Seguimiento de llamadas: \u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.604273]  ... \u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.604716] ct+0x2e9/ 0x550 [i915] \u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.604852] __i915_vma_unbind+0x7c/0x160 [i915] \u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.604977] force_unbind+0x24/0xa0 [i915] \u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.605098] x2f/0xa0 [i915] \u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.605210] __i915_gem_object_pages_fini+0x51/0x2f0 [i915] \u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.605330] __i915_gem_free_objects.isra.0+0x6a/0xc0 [i915] \u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.605440 process_scheduled_works+0x351/0x690... En el pasado, hubo fallas similares informado por CI de otras pruebas de IGT, observado en otras plataformas. Antes de confirmar 63baf4f3d587 (\"drm/i915/gt: solo espere la actividad de la GPU antes de desvincular una valla GGTT\"), i915_vma_revoke_fence() estaba esperando la inactividad de vma-\u0026gt;active a trav\u00e9s de fence_update(). Ese compromiso introdujo vma-\u0026gt;fence-\u0026gt;active para que fence_update() pudiera esperar selectivamente en ese en lugar de vma-\u0026gt;active, ya que solo se necesitaba la inactividad de los registros de cerca. Pero luego, otra confirmaci\u00f3n 0d86ee35097a (\"drm/i915/gt: Hacer que la revocaci\u00f3n de la valla sea inequ\u00edvoca\") reemplaz\u00f3 la llamada a fence_update() en i915_vma_revoke_fence() con solo fence_write(), y tambi\u00e9n agreg\u00f3 que GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_active_is_idle(\u0026amp;fence-\u0026gt;active )) Al frente. No se proporcion\u00f3 ninguna justificaci\u00f3n sobre por qu\u00e9 podr\u00edamos esperar que vma-\u0026gt;fence-\u0026gt;active est\u00e9 inactivo sin esperarlo primero. El problema puede deberse potencialmente a una carrera entre la revocaci\u00f3n de registros de valla por un lado y la ejecuci\u00f3n secuencial de devoluciones de llamadas de se\u00f1ales invocadas al completar una solicitud que las estaba usando por el otro, a\u00fan procesadas en paralelo a la revocaci\u00f3n de esos registros de valla. Solucionelo esperando a que vma-\u0026gt;fence-\u0026gt;active est\u00e9 inactivo en i915_vma_revoke_fence(). (cereza escogida del compromiso 24bb052d3dd499c5956abad5f7d8e4fd07da7fb1)"
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-41092",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T07:47:16.060",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.8,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2024-41092",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2024-09-10T16:20:35.535942Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2024-07-29T16:15:04.383",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/06dec31a0a5112a91f49085e8a8fa1a82296d5c7"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/29c0fdf49078ab161570d3d1c6e13d66f182717d"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/414f4a31f7a811008fd9a33b06216b060bad18fc"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/996c3412a06578e9d779a16b9e79ace18125ab50"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca0fabd365a27a94a36e68a7a02df8ff3c13dac6"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f771b91f21c46ad1217328d05e72a2c7e3add535"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/06dec31a0a5112a91f49085e8a8fa1a82296d5c7"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/29c0fdf49078ab161570d3d1c6e13d66f182717d"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/414f4a31f7a811008fd9a33b06216b060bad18fc"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/996c3412a06578e9d779a16b9e79ace18125ab50"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca0fabd365a27a94a36e68a7a02df8ff3c13dac6"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f771b91f21c46ad1217328d05e72a2c7e3add535"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-416"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…