FKIE_CVE-2024-45719

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-11-22 15:15 - Updated: 2025-07-01 20:29
Severity ?
2.6 (Low) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Summary
Inadequate Encryption Strength vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 1.4.0. The ids generated using the UUID v1 version are to some extent not secure enough. It can cause the generated token to be predictable. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.4.1, which fixes the issue.
References
security@apache.orghttps://lists.apache.org/thread/sz2d0z39k01nbx3r9pj65t76o1hy9491Mailing List, Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/11/22/1Mailing List
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
apache answer *
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:answer:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "8BCB5FFB-3C70-4CC7-9DC0-19942ED9E673",
              "versionEndExcluding": "1.4.1",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Inadequate Encryption Strength vulnerability in Apache Answer.\n\nThis issue affects Apache Answer: through 1.4.0.\n\nThe ids generated using the UUID v1 version are to some extent not secure enough. It can cause the generated token to be predictable.\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 1.4.1, which fixes the issue."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Vulnerabilidad de fuerza de cifrado inadecuada en Apache Answer. Este problema afecta a Apache Answer: hasta la versi\u00f3n 1.4.0. Los identificadores generados con la versi\u00f3n UUID v1 no son lo suficientemente seguros hasta cierto punto. Esto puede provocar que el token generado sea predecible. Se recomienda a los usuarios que actualicen a la versi\u00f3n 1.4.1, que soluciona el problema."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-45719",
  "lastModified": "2025-07-01T20:29:14.477",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 2.6,
          "baseSeverity": "LOW",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.0,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2024-11-22T15:15:10.473",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@apache.org",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/sz2d0z39k01nbx3r9pj65t76o1hy9491"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/11/22/1"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-326"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@apache.org",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.