FKIE_CVE-2024-47215

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-04-03 21:15 - Updated: 2025-04-23 14:55
Severity ?
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
An issue was discovered in Snowbridge setups sending data to Google Tag Manager Server Side. It involves attaching an invalid GTM SS preview header to events, causing them to be retried indefinitely. As a result, the performance of forwarding events to GTM SS overall can be affected (latency, throughput).
References
cve@mitre.orghttps://support.snowplow.io/hc/en-us/articles/26318139354909-Update-Critical-Snowplow-Security-Updates-Impact-on-Open-Source-Software-UsersPatch, Vendor Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
snowplow snowbridge -
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:snowplow:snowbridge:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "D2BEE8D3-A267-4C8E-A0D4-53A9DF6A8A74",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "An issue was discovered in Snowbridge setups sending data to Google Tag Manager Server Side. It involves attaching an invalid GTM SS preview header to events, causing them to be retried indefinitely. As a result, the performance of forwarding events to GTM SS overall can be affected (latency, throughput)."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Se detect\u00f3 un problema en las configuraciones de Snowbridge que env\u00edan datos al servidor de Google Tag Manager. Este problema implica adjuntar un encabezado de vista previa de GTM SS no v\u00e1lido a los eventos, lo que provoca que se reintenten indefinidamente. Como resultado, el rendimiento general del reenv\u00edo de eventos a GTM SS puede verse afectado (latencia y rendimiento)."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-47215",
  "lastModified": "2025-04-23T14:55:42.590",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-04-03T21:15:38.873",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Patch",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://support.snowplow.io/hc/en-us/articles/26318139354909-Update-Critical-Snowplow-Security-Updates-Impact-on-Open-Source-Software-Users"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-703"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.