FKIE_CVE-2024-47939

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-11-01 05:15 - Updated: 2025-05-21 07:16
Summary
Stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in multiple laser printers and MFPs which implement Ricoh Web Image Monitor. If this vulnerability is exploited, receiving a specially crafted request created and sent by an attacker may lead to arbitrary code execution and/or a denial-of-service (DoS) condition. As for the details of affected product names and versions, refer to the information provided by the vendors under [References].
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in multiple laser printers and MFPs which implement Ricoh Web Image Monitor. If this vulnerability is exploited, receiving a specially crafted request created and sent by an attacker may lead to arbitrary code execution and/or a denial-of-service (DoS) condition. As for the details of affected product names and versions, refer to the information provided by the vendors under [References]."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": " Existe una vulnerabilidad de desbordamiento de b\u00fafer en la regi\u00f3n stack de la memoria en varias Ricoh laser printers and MFPs que implementan Web Image Monitor. Si se explota esta vulnerabilidad, la recepci\u00f3n de una solicitud especialmente manipulada creada y enviada por un atacante puede provocar la ejecuci\u00f3n de c\u00f3digo arbitrario o una condici\u00f3n de denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (DoS). En cuanto a los detalles de los nombres y versiones de los productos afectados, consulte la informaci\u00f3n proporcionada por el proveedor en [References]."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-47939",
  "lastModified": "2025-05-21T07:16:01.050",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV30": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 7.7,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L",
          "version": "3.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 5.5,
        "source": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2024-11-01T05:15:05.950",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
      "url": "https://jp.ricoh.com/security/products/vulnerabilities/vul?id=ricoh-2024-000011"
    },
    {
      "source": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
      "url": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN87770340/"
    },
    {
      "source": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
      "url": "https://www.konicaminolta.jp/business/support/important/250519_01_01.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
      "url": "https://www.ricoh.com/products/security/vulnerabilities/vul?id=ricoh-2024-000011"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-121"
        }
      ],
      "source": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…