FKIE_CVE-2024-48944
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-03-27 15:15 - Updated: 2025-04-01 15:44
Severity ?
Summary
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Kylin. Through a kylin server, an attacker may forge a request to invoke "/kylin/api/xxx/diag" api on another internal host and possibly get leaked information. There are two preconditions: 1) The attacker has got admin access to a kylin server; 2) Another internal host has the "/kylin/api/xxx/diag" api
endpoint open for service.
This issue affects Apache Kylin: from 5.0.0
through
5.0.1.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 5.0.2, which fixes the issue.
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| security@apache.org | https://lists.apache.org/thread/1xxxtdfh9hzqsqgb1pd9grb8hvqdyc9x | Mailing List, Vendor Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/03/27/5 | Mailing List, Third Party Advisory |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:kylin:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F72140A9-0FB6-4F2E-BB10-FBD0EB155268",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.0.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Kylin. Through a kylin server, an attacker may forge a request to invoke \"/kylin/api/xxx/diag\" api on another internal host and possibly get leaked information. There are two preconditions: 1) The attacker has got admin access to a kylin server; 2) Another internal host has the \"/kylin/api/xxx/diag\" api\n\nendpoint open for service.\n\n\nThis issue affects Apache Kylin: from 5.0.0 \nthrough \n\n5.0.1.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 5.0.2, which fixes the issue."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Vulnerabilidad de Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) en Apache Kylin. A trav\u00e9s de un servidor Apache Kylin, un atacante podr\u00eda falsificar una solicitud para invocar la API \"/kylin/api/xxx/diag\" en otro host interno y posiblemente obtener informaci\u00f3n filtrada. Existen dos condiciones previas: 1) El atacante tiene acceso de administrador a un servidor Kylin; 2) Otro host interno tiene el endpoint de la API \"/kylin/api/xxx/diag\" abierto para servicio. Este problema afecta a Apache Kylin desde la versi\u00f3n 5.0.0 hasta la 5.0.1. Se recomienda a los usuarios actualizar a la versi\u00f3n 5.0.2, que soluciona el problema."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-48944",
"lastModified": "2025-04-01T15:44:43.393",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-03-27T15:15:53.573",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/1xxxtdfh9hzqsqgb1pd9grb8hvqdyc9x"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/03/27/5"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-918"
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…