FKIE_CVE-2024-5596

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-06-22 06:15 - Updated: 2026-04-15 00:35
Summary
The ARMember Premium plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 6.7. This is due to incorrectly implemented nonce validation function on multiple functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify, or delete user meta and plugin options which can lead to limited privilege escalation.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The ARMember Premium plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 6.7. This is due to incorrectly implemented nonce validation function on multiple functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify, or delete user meta and plugin options which can lead to limited privilege escalation."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El complemento ARMember Premium para WordPress es vulnerable a Cross-Site Request Forgery en versiones hasta la 6.7 incluida. Esto se debe a una funci\u00f3n de validaci\u00f3n nonce implementada incorrectamente en m\u00faltiples funciones. Esto hace posible que atacantes no autenticados modifiquen o eliminen metaopciones y complementos del usuario, lo que puede conducir a una escalada de privilegios limitada."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-5596",
  "lastModified": "2026-04-15T00:35:42.020",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 6.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 3.4,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2024-06-22T06:15:11.470",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://codecanyon.net/item/armember-complete-wordpress-membership-system/17785056"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/3e55591e-c1e9-4667-b04f-4956d2f37d51?source=cve"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://codecanyon.net/item/armember-complete-wordpress-membership-system/17785056"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/3e55591e-c1e9-4667-b04f-4956d2f37d51?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-352"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…